User Reviews (1 - 11 of 95)

Show these reviews first:

Highest Rated
Lowest Rated Newest
Oldest Most Helpful
Least Helpful

Pathetic.......

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 1 / 34
Date: July 13, 2005
Author: Amazon User

Man this game Sucks the only reason that i put 1 star is cause they wont let me put 0..This game Is Crappy and badly made Ya wanna spend money on this then Fine Just let me warn yopu this game is sooo Short It's beyond Crap

I'd rather watch paint dry.......

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 1 / 39
Date: December 03, 2005
Author: Amazon User

This game is a sneaking game....no more no less.It has no depth.All you do is sneak which is boring and this game has no variety. Spend your money on paint and watch it dry. Its much better than playing this overrated crap

suck

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 0 / 44
Date: May 16, 2005
Author: Amazon User

this game sssssssssssssuuuuuuuuuuuuccccccccccckkkkkkks my freind teddy loves it but its bad to the bone

Demeaning a Classic Game Franchise

2 Rating: 2, Useful: 4 / 18
Date: April 01, 2005
Author: Amazon User

I haven't played this game a whole lot yet. However I have played and learned enough to know what I need to know. First the graphics are phenominal. No complaints on the graphics, they are a huge improvement and a reason enough to buy the game. Many people are raving about this game, but in my opinion and what should be other's opinions: The series really sold out. Splinter Cell is about STEALTH, it is about something unlike any other games. This 3rd installment really destroys that originality. First, the gameplay, Sam is a agent meant to be undetected, shooting and contact is a last resort, but in here it is the game. There are NO alarms!!! What is that??? The series is built on sneaking and breaking into, now it is just a lot of shooting. And why give him a knife? Why give him hand to hand combat moves???? That is NOT what it is about! Very very sad that they resorted to making this a shooting game. The story is also ridiculous, the first two were slightly exagerated for effect but considerably realistic, this game is like a 007 movie. Also it is very very short. The enemies are finally given some AI but it doesn't matter because the game structure is so different. It is very sad that the original Splinty will be the best forever. The series had so much potential. The first was one of the best games ever, the 2nd was great but ver very short with a half written story with no plot twists, and now the 3rd is a series destroying game. It will really sell out the series and there will most likely be many more but the character and mystique of the game is long long gone.

is it worth buying?

3 Rating: 3, Useful: 1 / 23
Date: October 13, 2004
Author: Amazon User

the first splinter cell game was amazing. It was fun to play and had great graphics. The best part of the original Splinter Cell was that it took more than a day to beat. I'm sorry but why in the world Pandora Tomarrow was ever released is beyond me. It was just as fun as the first game, but only half as long. If a third Splinter Cell game is to be released I'm sure it will be visually great and fun to play, but if anyone can beat the game in less than five hours then why even bother? Maybe they should wait until Splinter Cell four is released and just add the two games together! Chaos theory has great potential, but if it only has eight levels-and half of them are real short, than this game is not worth buying. just spend the five bucks or whatever to rent it, cause you wont need to keep it for more than one night.

SPLINTER CELL : CHOAS THEORY :- REVIEW

3 Rating: 3, Useful: 1 / 7
Date: May 07, 2005
Author: Amazon User

GAMEPLAY:- slow paced , fun at times , map are laid out nicley.8/10

GRAPHICS:- nice shadows but overall graphics are very unrealistic. everything is shiny!! water looks likw=e clay , skin on people's faces are even shiny.7/10

SOUND/MUSIC:- good sound effects but a terrible music score. amon tobin's score is not good , location of mood music is all over the place.7/10

VALUE:- Okay singleplayer , excellent multiplayer.9/10

TILT:- good but could have been alot better , a very disapointing musical score , unrealistic "shiny" graphics, slow paced gameplay , but excellent multiplayer.

OVERALL SCORE :- 3/5 stars ***

GOOD BETTER THAN ITS PREDESSORS!

3 Rating: 3, Useful: 1 / 8
Date: February 20, 2006
Author: Amazon User

Its okay its quite fun better than Splinter Cell 1 and 2:Pandora tommorow.But this game is nothing to be compared to Metal Gear Solid 3:Snake Eater,or any Metal Gear Solid game for that matter.The Inverted Neck Breaker is fun and is the combat knife.The only way someone would prefer SC3 to MGS3 is if they like Realistic Stealth or if you are an Xbox fanboy or girl(no offence)-MGS3 carries more.There are lots of reasons i prefer MGS3 over SC3.
1)MGS3 has better gameplay,like camoflaging,boss fights,etc.
2)MGS3 has the RICHEST story of lots-the MGS3 story is a mixture of action,War,romance,thriller,horror,sadness,uhh PATRIOTISM!
3)best characters-everyone is fully envolved-ppl like Snake,EVA,The Boss,Major Tom,Col. Volgin and so on.
4)Best environment-The Jungle,and is very interactive you can climb trees,hunt animals,fishing-Also u get traiditional MGS inside environments-Exactly the same with cardbord boxes,lockers but you can now blow up storages,armories and food stores-These affect the gurads as they need food and weapons to be able to be stable and eliminate you.

SC3 is still good-i just prefer MGS3.Still ADD BOTH to your stealth games collection.

Sold Out? Only If You're A Loser Fanboy

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 2 / 5
Date: April 03, 2005
Author: Amazon User

Nah, this series hasn't sold out. Anyone who says otherwise obviously hasn't played the game. Stealth is still the main aspect of the game; you will die if you confront the guards head-to-head. As for giving Sam a knife: every known member of the military is given a knife for a last resort, so NOT giving Sam a knife in the first two games was ridiculous. Hand-to-hand combat? What soldier doesn't know some? And for those who think that alarms have been removed; they haven't. They're just not as much of a headache now because the mission isn't lost when you're spotted three times.
So go out an play this and ignore all the nay-sayers who haven't even bothered to play the game. The single-player is certainly fun, but the meat-and-potatoes of this bad-boy lies in its multiplayer.

Good game but just more of the same.........

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 2 / 3
Date: June 07, 2005
Author: Amazon User

If you played the first two games in this series you'll be right at home. You're able to run and gun more than in the past and it's nice not to be punished as much for setting off alarms. The controls, graphics (unfortunately you're usually in the dark), and sound are top notch.

Great STEALTH game

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 1 / 2
Date: August 21, 2005
Author: Amazon User

First, I dont have xbox live. I'm sure its awesome though. This game is really good. I tried to play the 1st S.Cell and gave up. This 3rd one was a lotta fun and I never gave up on it. The graphics are good but not "the best ever" like everyone is saying. Most of the game is played in the dark and shadows so the graphics aren't really a factor. If you want spectacular graphics then you need to play The Chronicles Of Riddick game. That game has awesome graphics in the dark AND in broad daylight. I haven't seen better graphics than that game yet, but correct me if I'm wrong. Anyway, you cant go wrong with this game. Rent it or buy it, it doesnt matter. Just get it and start playing.

Review Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next 

Actions