Below are user reviews of Medal of Honor: Allied Assault Spearhead and on the right are links to professionally written reviews.
The summary of review scores shows the distribution of scores given by the professional reviewers for Medal of Honor: Allied Assault Spearhead.
Column height indicates the number of reviews with a score within the range shown at the bottom of the column.
Higher scores (columns further towards the right) are better.
Summary of Review Scores |
| | | | | | | | | |
0's | 10's | 20's | 30's | 40's | 50's | 60's | 70's | 80's | 90's |
User Reviews (21 - 31 of 78)
Show these reviews first:
Spearhead is awesome
5
Rating: 5,
Useful: 2 / 2
Date: July 03, 2003
Author: Amazon User
... I pretty much only play online using Gamespy's server system and I think Spearhead is a huge improvement from the original Medal of Honor. Spearhead allows you to club your opponent with your weapon, while in MOHAA you could only club with the pistol. Also new weapons make the game exciting. Great new Bolt Action rifles( Lee Enfield and the Russian Mosin rifles are great weapons in multi-player modes)
... I experience no lag. I do have a DSL connection but big deal, who cares. Get a faster connection. 56K would not work well. I also have a good video card(radeon 9000 pro) and I have 512 RAM but I do not think that I have that advanced of hardware. This game is the best. I could not find a more fun online game to play. It only cost me $... bucks. Worth ever penny.
Fun but short
3
Rating: 3,
Useful: 2 / 2
Date: January 20, 2004
Author: Amazon User
Well, there is nothing especially wrong with this game. The opening scene is brilliant. You are a paratrooper in the 101st awaiting a drop behind enemy lines on D-Day. As you drift down, enemy flak opens up on you, and several of your planes crash and burn right in front. You land on top of a barn full of Nazis. Soon after that you have to link up with British commandos and eventually destroy a bridge. This is the longest of the 3 missions, which get shorter and shorter as the game progresses. I really enjoyed the 3rd mission - you must fight you way in a tank through Berlin - although it ends much too soon and ends the game too. There are 2 driving missions which are frustrating. You just destroy enemies, save, destroy more etc. until you have memorized their never-changing pattern. The only really different mission happens when you have to get a medic to your wounded CO through enemy shelling. Again nothing is really bad in this game, and it plays exactly like MOHAA. It's just too short.
Just as good as the base game
5
Rating: 5,
Useful: 2 / 3
Date: March 17, 2003
Author: Amazon User
If you like Medal Of Honor: Allied Assault, you will also like this game. It has the usual enhancements expansion packs generally have. Fundamentally however, this is more of the same as the original had. And that's a very good thing!
For some reason, the Medal Of Honor franchise manages to create an immersive athmosphere like no other first person shooter I am aware of. Although I am sure having been there was quite a different experience, this certainly gives you a feel of "being there".
another winner but with one problem
4
Rating: 4,
Useful: 2 / 3
Date: October 06, 2003
Author: Amazon User
I just bought the expansion pack, and so far I love it. It really doesn't add a whole lot to the original, but since MOHAA is one of the best games I've ever played, that's hardly a criticism. You start out the game in a transport plane about to be dropped deep behind enemy lines on June 6, 1994. Everything is super realistic, down to the "Screaming Eagle" patches on your 101st Airborne teammates uniforms. If you've seen "A Bridge Too Far", you may be familiar with this kind of scene (although that drop took place during the day). As you drop, Nazi cannons open up on your planes - several are hit, explode and burn in front of you as you fall. Once down, the mission becomes similar to several of the others in MOHAA - you must link up with your squadmates on the ground. My complaint about the first level is that, once you link up with British paratroopers, you must trade in your trusty M1 Garand for a British Enfield rifle. The Enfield packs a great punch but has a much longer load time between shots and between magazines than the M1. I though that the explosions were somewhat better than the first game - more vivid, and brighter. The Nazis look pretty much the same but seem to scurry around a little faster.
However, MOHS will update your old version of MOHAA whether you want it or not. This has given me some graphics problems - I have noticed a bright square around fallen Nazis. It doesn't affect game play, but it's annoying. I have fiddled around with the settings and have updated my drivers, yet I still have this problem. That's why MOHS gets only 4 stars from me. There should have been an option to keep the old version, since it was working just fine for me.
Could Have Been Better, but Still Pretty Good
4
Rating: 4,
Useful: 2 / 3
Date: September 07, 2004
Author: Amazon User
Spearhead foreshadowed the horror that is Breakthough, through a shortfall in the single player campaign. The campaign had numberous flaws; too short, ridiculous missions and various little things that I won't go into.
The campaign starts with you parachuting into France during Operation Overlord. You land in a barn, and fight your way to your British comrades where for some reason your M1 Garand, MP40 and Colt .45 are replaced with an Enfield, Sten and Webley revolver. I'm not sure why, I guess it's so you can use different weapons for a change. I hear a lot of people complaining about having to use the Enfield instead of the Garand, but you can just use the Sten if you don't like the Bolt-Action rifle. Either way, the campaign starts off well as you and your new friends wander the countryside blowing up artillery pieces and finally a bridge ending in a predictable cutscene where the bridge blows up as the train is about to cross and it ends up falling into the water. Either way, the campaign is not bad up to this point. No complaints.
Next, you're in the Ardennes fighting your way past German lines to steal a supply truck. This part is ok, you navigate the map, blowing up Nebelwerfers (rocket launcher artillery that you should remember if you paid attenion in Allied Assault) after you use them to blow up German tanks and half tracks. Everything's ok so far. Once you reach a German supply depot, you fight your way to a supply truck where the campaign goes crashing into a river like the train in France. Next thing you know, you're in a half track with an anti-tank cannon. Your job will now be to protect the supply truck from swarms of Germans with perfect aim at great distances. Once you beat this part, you'll know why Hitler lost the Battle of the Bulge seeing how many tanks and half tracks you'll have to destroy just to pass. If by some miracle you do, rest assured it doesn't get better. The next section is just a waste of time, plain and simple. You have to run from foxhole to foxhole, waiting for the artillery barrage to stop. After what seems like 8 hours and 50 foxholes later, you reach the medic where you have to repeat the whole thing again. They should have just left this out as it's not challenging at all and it adds nothing to the game. Still, the worst is not yet over. Next you'll have to hold the line which is sort of fun as you're basically slaughtering a horde of German soldiers, but you'll fail in the most pointless of ways, if one German (it doesn't matter if he's the last one) makes it into your trench. Apparently that's all it takes, even if you kill him a second after. Then you have to run to another line and repeat the process and then go back and do it once more. From then on, the campaign picks up. You advance and clear out a town and your part in the Ardennes is over. Nothing more worth mentioning, really.
Berlin will satsify those are obsessed with sniping as it's pretty much laid out for that. Long ranges, rubble, unsuspecting Germans, you get a nice Russian semi-automatic sniper rifle. I prefer the Mosin Nagant (even more so because I actually own one in real life.) You'll get to blow up some tanks with sticky bombs and 88mm artillery cannons. You steal the plans then the game takes a course for the bizarre. You'll find yourself controlling a Russian T-34 all by yourself. At least in Allied Assault, you had a team, but this is ridiculous. That means you drive the tank and operate the gun (that is loading, firing and aiming) all by yourself with your head outside the turret (!!!). That's one well trained soldier. Then you fight your way back to where you started with the Russian guys I neglected to mention earlier where there's a (suprise) large dramatic tank battle. When you win, it's all over. Painfull short, not that great.
The multiplayer is where Spearhead really shines. It really makes up for Allied Assault's mediocre multiplayer by adding new modes of play (Tug of War which is a more flexible kind of Objective match, really) maps, skins, weapons, etc... Being able whack people with nearly every single weapon instead of just pistols is nice. The Russian PPSH is very nice for short ranges (near bottomless clip) and gives Allies the chance to use bolt-action rifles if they want. Replacing the shotgun for the Germans is the much whined about rifle grenade which is really fun to use. Even though players claim it is the same a the rocket launcher, it's not. You're more of a rifleman (it's just a Mauser Kar 98k that can fire a grenade at an arc at longer distances than you can throw a hand grenade.) You don't get regular grenades so you just exchange how you can use your grenades.
All in all, if the multiplayer wasn't such a huge improvement, I'd give it 3 stars. If singleplayer was better, I'd give it 5 stars. Either way, it's well worth your money as long as you like to play multiplayer.
Save your money
1
Rating: 1,
Useful: 3 / 7
Date: September 15, 2004
Author: Amazon User
This game has more problems than I care to discuss. I have been a moderate game player for years, and never have I had more lock-ups, crashes and poor game play than I have had with this game. And, EA's site is a joke.
Buy a program from another company that actually works, and you don't have to screw around with just to start the program!
Shredding in the second war to end all wars!
5
Rating: 5,
Useful: 2 / 4
Date: November 18, 2002
Author: Amazon User
It doesn't matter if you are a hardcore online gamer; if for nothing else, buy this game for the new single player missions, they are K I L L E R !! The graphics will suck you in and keep you, from 3000 feet above Normandy and on! Of course the game is as scripted as Allied Assault, but talk about feeling like you are starring in your own HBO mini-series! Crank up your pc sound system, and listen to the enemy wail as you waste them with guns that would make Ted Nugent blush! If you liked Allied Assault, you will LOVE this one! Now go play in the snow!
Definitely not MEDAL OF HONOR quality!
2
Rating: 2,
Useful: 2 / 4
Date: January 18, 2005
Author: Amazon User
SPEARHEAD has virtually none of the game play quality which abounded in the original MEDAL OF HONOR. The movement of the characters is very choppy, even after you cut down on detail in the "Options" menu. This is the case even on the fastest computers (just look at the other reviews).
The historical quality of this game is the only thing it has going for it. I have never seen the movie THE BATTLE OF THE BULGE, but after playing this game, I would now like to. Also, I did not know that the paratroopers that landed in France before D-Day were coming in under heavy fire. I always figured they just went in quietly and for the most part, unnoticed. (Now, I feel stupid for having thought that.) So, the game does tend to open one's eyes to the horrors of war and what those men went through.
Actually, the primary problem I have with this game is that it's too difficult. Now, before anyone dismisses me for a wimp, let me just say that I love difficult and challenging games. But there are levels of difficulty in most games (this particular one included). Usually, it's "Easy," "Medium," and "Hard" - or something along those lines. My point is, if they wanted a super-hard game to show the player how tough war is, then they very easily could have provided those difficulties on the harder levels. For me, this game has no re-playability on even the easy level, much less the more difficult ones.
The difficulty of this game is not to be compared to other popular first-person-shooters like the Jedi series, GHOST RECON, the HALF-LIFE series, or even MEDAL OF HONOR: ALLIED ASSAULT. Those games and many others like them present certain difficulties, but after the player moves past the difficult part, there's time to catch one's breath a bit. In SPEARHEAD, it's constant action with no time or opportunity to stop and enjoy the game. I realize this is war. But it's also a game. In fact, it's a game first. And these two must be carefully balanced in order for the game to be a quality product.
This game is not a quality product.
Wheres the originality?
3
Rating: 3,
Useful: 1 / 1
Date: November 14, 2002
Author: Amazon User
The game is fabulous, but where's the originality? It's basically just some new weapons, levels, and other things. The full version has some bugs which are sometimes intolerable, and they removed half of all the skins in MP mode!
I would suggest buying the next MOH game in 2003. I'm sure that will be a great enhancement.
Spearhead - A Let Down
3
Rating: 3,
Useful: 1 / 1
Date: December 07, 2002
Author: Amazon User
With much anticipation after playing MOHAA, I purchased Spearhead as soon as it was available. I was disappointed with it in that it wasn't up to the standards of the original. Some of the battles are overly easy and others are overly difficult. There doesn't seem to be any consistency with the difficulty levels. I must say it was a let down after playing the original.
Actions