0
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z




PC - Windows : Call of Duty: United Offensive Reviews

Gas Gauge: 84
Gas Gauge 84
Below are user reviews of Call of Duty: United Offensive and on the right are links to professionally written reviews. The summary of review scores shows the distribution of scores given by the professional reviewers for Call of Duty: United Offensive. Column height indicates the number of reviews with a score within the range shown at the bottom of the column. Higher scores (columns further towards the right) are better.

Summary of Review Scores
0's10's20's30's40's50's60's70's80's90's


ReviewsScore
Game Spot 89
Game FAQs
CVG 87
IGN 84
GameSpy 70
GameZone 93
Game Revolution 80
1UP 90






User Reviews (51 - 61 of 71)

Show these reviews first:

Highest Rated
Lowest Rated
Newest
Oldest
Most Helpful
Least Helpful



Best fps out their

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 1 / 2
Date: September 27, 2004
Author: Amazon User

I have been playing FPS for years and this series is by far one of the best ones I have ever played. I dont even mind that the graphics arent up to par with the other games out there.

Very Good Game!

5 Rating: 5, Useful: 1 / 3
Date: November 07, 2004
Author: Amazon User

This game is the most realistic, stunning and immersive WWII game to date. The closest to feeling like the actual thing (as one can imagine, of course). Better than the first, and considered one of the best expansion packs released for a PC game.

I highly recommend it for fans of Medal of Honor, Battlefield, Call of Duty, Day of Defeat, or just fans of the genre.

Not as good as Call of Duty

3 Rating: 3, Useful: 2 / 11
Date: January 31, 2005
Author: Amazon User

Overall I felt this expansion lacked the quality of Call of Duty, at least in single player. Multiplayer I do like, Domination was great with the Jeeps and Tanks. I had to cheat past the third american mission, it was so badly designed and poorly made. I feel Grey Matter screwed up the single player of this expansion. I finished Call of Duty and this expansion became so unfair and tedious i never finished the expansion in SP.

cod uo

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 1 / 6
Date: December 31, 2004
Author: Amazon User

This game is one of the best fist person shooter i've every played it is a great add on to call of duty. IT is the funnest online playing so i recommend not to get it if you don't have internet acess. Overall this this game is the best ww2 shooter. The game has some noticeable glitches tho.

multiplayer

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 1 / 6
Date: October 18, 2005
Author: Amazon User

first and last of all artillery support make this game behind the original cod, very bad for noobs also, with the artillery support it make this game boring after i play for a while, stick to the original cod noobs untill u think u are good enough to play, u had to get to a higher rank to use the artillery thats all i will tell u. PS. cod is better than the expansive pack buy it anyway for the singleplayer.

cool game but bad multiplayer

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 1 / 9
Date: July 10, 2005
Author: Amazon User

The singleplayer was good and way harder than the original, but the multiplayer was bad because not much peaple in it, I think they all went to MOHAA seem to be more peaple over there, I might well go try it see if it work, if u buy call of duty only for multiplayer i warn you go try something else, since there not much peaple on multiplayer i give this game a four.

Please not another UT2004....

3 Rating: 3, Useful: 3 / 66
Date: September 01, 2004
Author: Amazon User

I've been looking at the info for this game and I can say they're definately trying to mimic UT2004 multiplay. I mean, look at the new modes... Capture The Flag, Base Assault and Domination. Does this not sound like UT to you? And how do these modes fit into a game like Call of Duty?? Modes like Search & Destroy and Retrieval are more creative and make you feel more like a part of WWII. I also heard that they're going to make the guns more accurate and have a higher rate of fire... if so, less skill will be involved, closing the gap between noobs and real players. I don't know about the vehicles yet, but I'm pretty certain that it's just another idea snagged from UT.

The thing wrong w/ this game is

2 Rating: 2, Useful: 1 / 25
Date: January 08, 2005
Author: Amazon User

THE HOLE TIME. i am a very big fan of the call of duty games in fach i have the first one for my pc. A little latter on i bought the expasion 'united offensive' and i was dissopointed some of the things they added just ruend the game. i still love the call of duty games and will get all the expansions that come along but i hope theyle fix it later on

Good Game Bad shipping

5 Rating: 5, Useful: 0 / 1
Date: October 02, 2004
Author: Amazon User

Call of duty United offensive is a awsome game, but if you order it through amazon, try to change it to another store, bc amazon's shipping is the worst that ive ever seen... It is slow, and the tracking is awful.

But going a little more into the game... here we go... The single player part is awsome but short, you can experience everything in the single player campaigns. BUt when u start the multiplayer there is this thing that i dont like which are the tanks. The tanks don't blow up easily, you need like 4 bazooka shots to get the tank down, and trust me it is not cool, to have a tank infront of u and u have no ammo left...

Played the Demo, Seems Good

5 Rating: 5, Useful: 0 / 2
Date: October 03, 2004
Author: Amazon User

I donloaded the demo and United Offensive seems like a good game. Call Of Duty was good, so you could only expect it to get better.
First of all, there are new basic weapons, like the silenced Sten. There are also flamethrowers used by the Germans. Best of all, you get deployable machine guns. Every WW2 game should have deployable machine guns.
The graphics are enhanced and levels seem to be bigger. I can't wait until I get the full version.


Review Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next 



Actions