0
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z




PC - Windows : Call of Duty 2 Reviews

Gas Gauge: 87
Gas Gauge 87
Below are user reviews of Call of Duty 2 and on the right are links to professionally written reviews. The summary of review scores shows the distribution of scores given by the professional reviewers for Call of Duty 2. Column height indicates the number of reviews with a score within the range shown at the bottom of the column. Higher scores (columns further towards the right) are better.

Summary of Review Scores
0's10's20's30's40's50's60's70's80's90's


ReviewsScore
Game Spot 88
Game FAQs
GamesRadar 90
CVG 91
IGN 85
GameSpy 100
GameZone 90
Game Revolution 75
1UP 80






User Reviews (71 - 81 of 110)

Show these reviews first:

Highest Rated
Lowest Rated
Newest
Oldest
Most Helpful
Least Helpful



Not quite as much fun as the first one but enjoyable

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 1 / 3
Date: November 07, 2006
Author: Amazon User

I enjoyed playing this game, but it is quirky on my machine. I have 512MB of memory and it seems to not be enough for the game to load smootly. It had a tendancy to hang up at times when loading modules.

My biggest complaint is there is no way to disable the 'windows' key. I often hit it diring heavy combat and hard to start over.

A smaller complaint is the ending, it is quite abrupt and much less satisfying as the first game.

On the positive side, the graphics are great and I am looking forward to Call of Duty 3.

A little disappointed

3 Rating: 3, Useful: 1 / 3
Date: February 19, 2007
Author: Amazon User

I was not fully impressed with the new release of Call of Duty2. It was 6 disks long, and tagged a high price. One would expect a great improvement over the original CoD, and its great sucessor United Offesive. CoD2 was a let down for me. I thought I would get an overall improvement and change over the original idea. But it wasn't. Weapons did not work like in CoD. The Thompson lost it's unique kick, with high slugging impack, and the rifle it's 'knock-out' fire power and high accuracy. The A.I. of the enemy was way-off. I began the game on regular difficulty to help make it more challenging, but sometimes the germans would catch you right on and fall down like mannequins. When a game is not challenging, there is no thrill in playing it. Millitary tactiques are nothing but challenging and complex. The game makes it too easy. Overall CoD2 is again a very fun. Graphics have been improved slightly, added features and mult-paths. (This will slow the game down on old machines. I had some trouble running it on a p4 2.6 Mhz dual with nVidia 6200, and it did run slow). With all the work they are doing with the game, one would think they would improve the A.I. and overall game, but they didn't. I am becoming more of a Brother's in Arms fan now. I think it has more Realism and better A.I. Far Cry is the best for A.I. You'd think they'd borrow from each other and improve. I hope this review was helpful.

Call Of Duty 2 (Review)

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 1 / 3
Date: May 16, 2007
Author: Amazon User

I haven't played the game all the way through yet but so far it has been a lot of fun, the graphics are great, and the soud is pretty realistic too!

The Best

5 Rating: 5, Useful: 1 / 4
Date: June 18, 2006
Author: Amazon User

Hi, my name is Jasdev and i think that cod2 is 'The Best!'you get to play as the Russians, the British, and the Americans. You should buy this game! On the down side, it was a little bit short, and you don't get to play as the Germans. But otherwise, it's a sick game! One of the best ww2 games ever! so go on, buy it, its worth the money. you won't be dissapointed!

I agree with the kid!

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 6 / 66
Date: October 27, 2005
Author: Amazon User

Come on this is not good! There is no talent into this type of gameplay! The problem with soooo mannnyyyy game designer's today is that they are not very creative! They serotype tooo muccchhh like the kid said. Yes, the allies were the good guys and yes Socialism is wrong but why do we see WW2 from the allies side? Why can't we see it from the Axis side? Or have the choice? I'm don't care about multiplayer were kiddiees run around and run and gun, bunny hop and alll that with no real tactics, heck they know nothing of the war or tactics! Go back to URT 04 or Quake! This is war and there is no bunny hoping or rambo sytle combat in war. Everyone fights together as a team in a team. The funny thing is in the UO expansion they advertised that no one fought alone yet somehow you were the only one that could kill anything as if your me were just there in the background shooting at who know what? Brother and Arms is 10 times better than this game why? You can order your men around, flake the enemy more than just one way, and your aim is not as accurte? The guy who said it was junk because he couldn't hit anything was saying he can't hit anything and he can't jump either. Maybe he was trying to high jump over a bush. Good luck!

Anyway, if you really want to be creative create a game where you can fight turn based style either side or front of the war. Maybe if they just mix the Rome Total War style with First Person battle and relisem it could be a great hit! and of course add a world map where you could move your units around being Navy, Airforce, or Marines to different locations. That would change the WW2 hum-drums totally around! You could also play different roles as a commander or a general to a grunt soilder! Different battlefields, different weapons from each side, Tanks, artillery, you name it. Genuis!

CoD 2 is no UO, and that's the problem

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 1 / 5
Date: February 17, 2006
Author: Amazon User

This much awaited game is disappointing CoD fans worldwide. Beyond its demands on hardware, game play is tedious, maps are limited, and for multi-player no punk buster.

I have a VERY hi-perf system (Dell XPS 600) 2 gigs ram, dual 256 vid bds, and still the game lags in multiplay, while UO plays at 200 fps in highest settings.

This game is a BIG disappointment. Think carefully before buying.

great, but maybe a little less great than the original

5 Rating: 5, Useful: 1 / 5
Date: November 23, 2006
Author: Amazon User

cod was groundbreaking. short but with a lot of variety in the levels. cod 2 is a bit longer, but with less variation in the levels. great, but not great, great if you know what i mean.

CoD2 only xp

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 3 / 39
Date: November 26, 2005
Author: Amazon User

The requirements posted at amazon site say 98/ME/2000/XP.

That was great. I was ready to buy, but Activision states CoD2 not compatible with 95/98/ME.

CoD is compatible but CoD2 is not compatible 98 or ME.

I can't run this without 2000 or XP OS. My hardware is fine but now I have to make my system boot both XP and 98. NUTS

Jilted IW really Messed this one up

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 3 / 43
Date: November 27, 2005
Author: Amazon User

Bug Riddled. Almost evrey map has exploits. This combined with all the built in hacks that COD1 had and absolutely no Anti-Cheat (PB) makes this a hackers dream come true.Hackers use wall hacks, aimbots at will, and can shut anyones server down, also at will. And Infinity Ward does not care.Mass multiplayer Server strike pending , read about it at iwnation.com/forums. I didnt buy it at amazon, but I believe that thier customers interested in buying this junk should be informed of the truth.If I was Amazon, I'd pull it from the shelves to avoid the inevitable angry customers.

Oh, and the single player is a joke. Too easy. Only gets one star for graphics...to bad they didnt attach that to a decent game.

Call of Duty 2

2 Rating: 2, Useful: 2 / 27
Date: November 19, 2005
Author: Amazon User

Way over priced!! Maybe a $20 game. Total rip off for $50


Review Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next 



Actions