User Reviews (1 - 11 of 80)

Show these reviews first:

Highest Rated
Lowest Rated Newest
Oldest Most Helpful
Least Helpful

Wow this is bad!

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 4 / 6
Date: April 26, 2002
Author: Amazon User

I cant believe how [bad] this game is! I was really disappointed in Westwood with this game. It doesnt flow at all. I have Geforce 4 card and a decent system but for some reason the play back on the in game movies is very choppy. Only game I own that does that. The AI is horrible, sound is below average and the choppyness of the movie editing is jaring. The enviorments are very sparse and lack a lot of detail. I love Red Alert 2 and Tiberian Sun was good too, but Westwood really did a bad job with this one. Im surprised on how it got this many good reviews on Amazon. If you like RTCW and Medal of Honor DONT BUY THIS GAME! Those games are WAY better. Ill play them over and over, but this one I wont even finish. I sell it or something. Its just that bad.

bad game

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 3 / 6
Date: March 18, 2002
Author: Amazon User

Its really not worth your money. After you play the first stage, you will be amazed how beautiful and creative people from Westwood studios are. But after the second, third stage, you will realize that there's no point to beat this game. Ackward graphics, repetitive and boring. And its slow too. I'm sure that people who give this game 5 star is just playing the first stage only. WARNING: Because of slow and dropping framerates, dizziness and motion sickness will occur after half an hour playing.

I was expecting MUCH bette

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 2 / 21
Date: February 17, 2002
Author: Amazon User

I wrote a review a while ago about this game saying how it was going to be bad because this game is definetely eye candy (if u could even call it that). I just played the multiplayer demo yesterday, and it was highly dissapointing... the game has so many bugs i cant describe them all... but here are a few:
1. VERY LAGGY
2. CAN't HAVE 5 GUNS AT A TIME. MAXIMUM OF 3
3. CAN't BIND SOME OF THE CONTROLLS TO THE KKEYS THAT U WANT (EXAMPLE: Can't bind strafe left to left arrow key)
4. When you reload, it will do the reloading animation twice or even more sometimes
5. After reloading, it will shoot uncontrollably

The game is good for one reason. The creativity. No company would think about making a top view war strategy game and then make a sequel to it except it was a first person shooter in the eyes of a soldier in the game. So the only good thing about this game is the creativity. You can see why this game is bad now. Prepare to be dissapointed if you buy this game. Hope this helps, PEACE

CHEATER'S over run the multiplayer

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 2 / 5
Date: August 29, 2002
Author: Amazon User

The single player is great but the multiplayer is over run with CHEATER's, and westwood hasn't updated it but once and that wus a month after it came out so don't get your hopes up this wus a real disappointment for all you multiplayers out there who hate CHEATERS........................................

your mom

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 2 / 15
Date: August 04, 2003
Author: Amazon User

your mom...................... could beat this........... your mom is easy

What a disappointment

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 1 / 4
Date: June 11, 2002
Author: Amazon User

This game is truely a disappointment. Support from Westwood is nearly impossible to get. The game is still full of bugs after 4 months and 2 patches.

if the devil was to release a game, this would be it.

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 3 / 13
Date: February 10, 2003
Author: Amazon User

Well... how do I sum this up?? I could give it a one-word review.. ... or I could go into a little more detail.
I went to my local games shop one day with my hard earned ...and had a scan of the shelves, and BANG.. It hit me!! The colourfull front cover with an intruding burly bloke looking at me. The only way I can Justify myself buying this heap of elephant poo, is that I was disorientated by the over colorful cover, or by the shiny cling film that it was wrapped in.
Well i ask myself now, why did i have to open that cling film?
This game ... in every aspect.
Gameplay: What? there is gameplay? well you could have fooled me. 0/10
Graphics: Ehh.. well this would be more impressive if it was run off the original "castle wolfenstein 3D " engine 0/10
weapons: dont get me started on the weapons. 0/10
vehicals: the only game in the world that lets you drive in port-a-loo's.
Well, Im going to stop now before i blow a blood vessel in my head... Over all rating? -1/10
(the one star if the lowest i can give it, although i think that there should be more of a selection for this game.. like 0 stars.

What is this supposed to be?

2 Rating: 2, Useful: 4 / 10
Date: March 14, 2002
Author: Amazon User

Hm...When I first bought Renegade, I was expecting something to rival Halo (the best shooting game in the world), but instead, I was met with a pile of crud. Although its good qualities include that its so creative and that the multiplayer is exquisite (because online, there's an excuse for choppiness!) On single player, the missions are boring, long and frustrating in which all you do is shoot Nod soldiers and move. The weapons function oddly as well. Pressing 'R' to reload commonly makes your weapon reload two or three times and then shoot continuously, wasting your new clip anyway! Guns become weak in multiplayer and base defenses make it nearly impossible to infiltrate an enemy base. The choppiness I mentioned earlier is abundant in single player mode for no reason and the graphics look awful. The environments look as though poor children in sweat shops built them out of milk cartons in a country that had never seen milk cartons before! You also can adjust the graphics, but it makes the game ridiculously slow and choppy. Westwood sure spent its time making this 'crap-in-a-box' game, but the three years of programming seemed to have done nothing. The original screen shots from 1998 looked better than it does now. I just can't understand it. If you're looking for a game to be disappointed with, plop down 5000 lonesome soldiers for Renegade and get a good laugh at its thousands of problems.

Why this game is below average...

2 Rating: 2, Useful: 3 / 9
Date: March 17, 2002
Author: Amazon User

I was appalled at the look of this game.
I have been playing for about 6 hours now, and I can't believe that this game was made in the last 2 years.
The graphics are lame, and the confusing layouts of the levels leave much to be desired.
The Enemy AI is weak, almost embarrassing at times.
I tried, but could not connect to an online multi-player game, but I can tell already that it will be nowhere as fun or pretty as Tribes 2 is.
Tribes 2, a game that was released about a year before this title, makes this game look like a bunch of brain damaged monkeys made it.
I LOVED the C&C games, and still play from time to time, even if Red Alert had some ramping issues.
I think that it is a shame that so many people will buy this game, and think that this is the best that current 3-d shooters have to offer.
Pass on this, and take a look at Medal of Honor Allied Assault for a great single player game, or Tribes 2 for on-line multi-player fun.
Westwood should be embarrassed that this title shipped looking the way it does.

could have been a lot better

2 Rating: 2, Useful: 3 / 7
Date: April 30, 2002
Author: Amazon User

i was really disappointed with c&c's newest release. Although i am not one of those fanatical C&C fans, i do love first person shooters (fps). The AI is the most horrible i've ever seen in a fps, and i've played a lot of games. The characters look like boxes, Havoc's personality is a cardboard cutout, the script and story line is hilariously bad, and Havoc's lines are corny. Most of all, both the single player and multiplayer are desperately below par. The single player was much too short, the bosses are too easy to kill, and the scenery is atrocious. The multiplayer is just as bad, since the base defences are much too difficult to bypass and you can only carry one weapon at a time. Westwood truly disappointed me with this game, i thought they were capable of a more thought out and prepared game. If you are going to spend [$$$] on a game, spend in on Max Payne or Return to Castle Wolfenstein. Unless you're a diehard C&C fan, this one probably isn't for you.

Review Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next 

Actions