User Reviews (21 - 29 of 29)

Show these reviews first:

Highest Rated
Lowest Rated Newest
Oldest Most Helpful
Least Helpful

Looks Awesome!

5 Rating: 5, Useful: 1 / 25
Date: November 10, 2004
Author: Amazon User

This new "James Bond" game looks awesome. I watched prewies on it and it looks like an awesome game. You can finally have dual weapons. They do not have to be the same weapons to have a dual either. The graphics looks great. This looks like it is going to be a hit. This is a definite buy for me.

Goldeneye Rogue Agent fails to stand up to orig Goldeneye

2 Rating: 2, Useful: 0 / 7
Date: December 23, 2004
Author: Amazon User

If you remember the good ole days of Goldeneye on nintendo 64. This game pales in comparison. It's unfortunate, but the slow reloading of the guns mixed with an 'A' grade soundtrack and poorly set out levels makes for a bummer of a game. Like I said the best thing running for this title is the soundtrack. (...)

Not as good as the N64 game

3 Rating: 3, Useful: 0 / 5
Date: December 27, 2004
Author: Amazon User

It's a decent james bond game, WAIT, O YEA, You're not James Bond! That Blows! Apparently you're some bad MI6 agent with a mysterious gold eye that has special powers. Thats kinda stupid but I do have to give them props for bringing it back to FPS instead of that third person crap. This isn't as good as the N64 version, actually this game has nothing to do with the original goldeneye. Pros: 1. Its back to a FPS 2. Good Songs 3. Xbox live 4. Duel wielding Cons: 1. You're not James Bond 2. Its not really spy, its more run and gun 3. The story line sucks 4. It has nothing to do with the original goldeneye

Pathetic

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 0 / 5
Date: December 29, 2004
Author: Amazon User

This new Bond is stupid. You're not even 007 to start with. Also it just does not ring true with the Bond theme to be bad, James Bond is supposed to be the good guy, while in this, the main highlight is shooting innocent people. The pathetic idea of dragging in two ancient Bond villains, who died, to war against each other is so incredibly moronic that it ruins the entire gameplot, reducing it to mindlessly shooting random people. Extremely disappointing, permanently damaging Bond's reputation.

NOT A BOND GAME

2 Rating: 2, Useful: 0 / 8
Date: January 01, 2005
Author: Amazon User

This is not an average bond game. If you liked nightfire or everything or nothing, DO NOT BUY THIS GAME!!! sure you get to take enemies hostage and thow them off buildings, but its pointless! I made a big mistake buying this game. If you want a good action shooter get a Tom Clancy game. I'm not even sure if you can even do a splitscreen multiplayer with this game!

the bomb shell

2 Rating: 2, Useful: 0 / 1
Date: March 30, 2005
Author: Amazon User

wow this game was realy stupid as hell. i couldnt belive i actualy bought it for x box it was horrible and dont even deserve the golden eye title which was one of the best bond games to date. The graphics arnt very bad but nothing great with box looking enemies that are so dumb as hell and it gets so boring all you do is kill wave after wave of guys this game should not be on x box it should be in a arcade with a plastic gun for it then mabe it would be an ok game. I just didnt like it at all and it wasnt worth near the 50 bucks for it i paid. Very disapointing after how good ea did with every thing or nothing which was my favorite bong game ever but this one bit the damn dust even though i hate to say it so i sold it a few weeks after i bought it and only played it a few times . sorry ea you just cant remake golden eye and it dont look like you even tried with this game even though bein an eveil agent and not bein bond was new it still didnt make up for how bad the game was . i hope (from russia with love) makes up for this bond game if u can even call it a bond game .

Can you say biggest dissapointment of 2004? I can

2 Rating: 2, Useful: 0 / 3
Date: April 09, 2005
Author: Amazon User

My god what was EA thinking? I swear to god EA has taken one of the best FPS ever and smeardd it in (...) and then tryed to feed it to the Queen of England! This game is as horrid as Michal More in a thong!

Ok, lets talk about the graphics. The only good part is the ragdoll physics, otherwise get ready for horible textures and character models. It looks like a ps2 launch title.

The sound is barley ok. The voiceovers kinda suck and the gun sounds are ok.

Lets talk about the gameplay. It is basically a go there, shoot this dude, go somewhere else and shoot another dude. It is boreing and anoying.

Ok, so there is one good thing about it. The multiplayer is pretty fun, but the graphics take away from the expirence. Dual weilding is also fun, but it will make you want to play a good game with dual weilding(caugh-caugh-halo2-caugh)

If you have never played a FPS before, you will still think this game is (...). Ya know why? Because it is.

Concept- Replace one of the best FPS on consloe, but make a stinking piece of (...)

Presintation- 7.5- The box art is misleading (if it says on the back that the game has good things, dont believe it!) The menues are good though.

Graphics- 5.0- Hirrid, the worst looking FPS on console right now (other then Shadow Opps: Red Mucury)

Sound- 6.0- Gun sounds =ok, voice overs= not ok, music= gay

Gameplay- 7.0- It can be fun on multiplayer, but the single player sucks and its boreing

Entertainment- 5.0- Will make you want to play the original 007 Golden Eye for N64

Replay Value- 4.0- You will quit before you are done with the single player

(just a little advise- the entertainment score is the overall score on all my reviews)

It's an aquirred taste

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 0 / 1
Date: December 03, 2006
Author: Amazon User

This is, contrary to what others say, a good game. While the graphics are not the best, and the single player is slightly sub-par, it is still fun. After all, the multipalyer is where it's at. There are like 10 different guns, 4 standard, 6 i have never seen before. Ever. You got guns that shoot through walls, big rotating guns, disentegrators(did i spell that right?), little zappy thing that doesn't even stun 'em,(why is that there? it has no use.) even this weird green thing that poisons people! The multiplayer is very fun, with deathtraps,multiple skins,exclusive guns,and the ability to shoot seagulls!poor seagull:( Anyway, i don;t get why people are rating it so bad. The A.I is actually pretty smart. Not much on F.E.A.R, but... Plus, all you people that give it bad reveiws are probaly just guys that are addicted to Halo and are upset that you can't spell. Here's an example of your reveiw:"i dnt lke ths gam bcze it si stoopid nd teh 2plyr stoopid to. xbiox stink lke mnkys nd teh wiii do to PS3 si teh bomb bcze it bst nd haz movey cntrlr butt wiii cpyd PS3 nd si bd PS3 RLE!!" So, there is my review. Final word: pretty good.

Oh my....

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 0 / 1
Date: June 13, 2007
Author: Amazon User

I am an avid video game player, so please take heed to my words if your thinking on purchasing. Even though it is a James Bond game, it absouletly sucks. I ahve probally played every game out there, and this low on the list
It's like they took F.E.A.R. and made it James Bond, and added a little daylight and took away the girl and blood. This game lacked everything a action game needs. Lame, lame, lame.

Review Page: 1 2 3 

Actions