User Reviews (41 - 51 of 57)

Show these reviews first:

Highest Rated
Lowest Rated Newest
Oldest Most Helpful
Least Helpful

Good but gets old FAST

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 0 / 3
Date: July 21, 2005
Author: Amazon User

I LOVE THIS GAME. Im not going to put a long ass essay about the game Im just getting to the point. I pre-ordered it and got it the day it came out. I was EXTREMLY impressed. The graphics in this game are incredible. The mulit-player is EXTREMLY fun and addicting. The humor is still the same as before. Okay I have not played this game after the first 2 weeks. The game yes folks gets extremly BORING after a while. Theres barley any maps in mulitplayer and you just quit doing that. The single player's very easy and once you get done you will not want to play again. This game is great just replay value is low for me.

Decent

3 Rating: 3, Useful: 0 / 1
Date: July 30, 2005
Author: Amazon User

This was a very unique game back on n64 now we see wierd games like this all the time just mabe not as violent. This is a prety fun game and interesting for about 15 minuts then you just wana turn it off and get sick of seein the same anoyin ass tediz come after you.It has its ups like its fun and has a mix of every kind of game play from difrent genres which is cool but it doesnt realy mix it all together realy good and the story doesnt make very much sense or has any meaning.The best part of this game are graphics which are very good and clear , but that isnt enough to buy this game, it is for sure not worth the dam 50$ price its worth a rental and thats about it. They tried to make the online play a key part and make it fun but it just isnt , it gets old quick and its prety much the same thing over and over and i would like to pick a difrent person while im still in the battle, but the m player is just prety lame and not very inventive and when theres halo2 online this game looks like a joke. So dont buy this game for 50 bucks wait till its cheper or just rent it .

blows

2 Rating: 2, Useful: 0 / 16
Date: June 21, 2005
Author: Amazon User

the "live" is way to fast paced, its very confusing, nothing like the first multiplayer.

Don't waste your money

2 Rating: 2, Useful: 0 / 21
Date: June 23, 2005
Author: Amazon User

This game sucks. All the swearing is bleeped out and it is a platformer not a 3rd person shooter.

this game will rock!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

5 Rating: 5, Useful: 0 / 5
Date: June 23, 2005
Author: Amazon User

well i havent played the full version of conker but ive played the demo by the looks of it it looks extremely fun my parents are still debating if i should get it u know because of the m rating but if i get it it will rock the online multiplayer will be awesome my friend was playin it online when i was playin halo 2 online anyways i think it will be a great game dont listen to the people who said it was just a platformer its really a platformer and shooter well if u get the chance to buy conker live & reloaded buy it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What a huge dissapointment...

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 0 / 10
Date: June 25, 2005
Author: Amazon User

O.k... Bad Fur Day is one of the best games ever made...
I give you that , ... We all are fans of the game , .. that's why this version was so anticipated , ... But we basically got the same thing...
The "LIVE" , game , really , really sucks , ... There's so much going on the screen , that you can't even tell who's who , or what's what... I understand that each character has a name , for online pourpuses , .. But it's really confusing , ...

Buy this game , if you havent played Bad Fur day , ... but if you already played it , ... be warned , that the multiplayer ... it's not that good , ... you'll probably play it , twice before you get bored and move on....

Conker Conkered Nothing

3 Rating: 3, Useful: 0 / 3
Date: August 09, 2005
Author: Amazon User

I was not excepting conker live&Reloaded to have the same plot as the N64 version conker bad fur day. It is visually awesome and the best the Xbox has to offer. You will find all the wierd but unique characters that make this game cool. The puzzles they throw out at you can be sloved by a 3 year-olds, the game is thick and has alot of humor. Conker is a cool character and it will take you a week to beat this thick and some-what challenging game. This game may not look like a M game but it is rated M for more reasons than GTA San Andreas is for the PS2. The only new thing is Online Mode and team based play. You can play as the Tediz ( Evil Teddy Bears ) vs the squirrel squad and play different mini-games and fight. The controls still suck, its hard to walk straight and jump on platforms. The stroy is still the same, and the characters still cuss like crazy. Its a solid game and can hold its own. I Give it 3 stars

Posititve Side
+ Amazing Visuals
+ Online play
+ Cool Characters

Negitive Side

- Crapy camera angles
- Awfull controls
- Real Repetive
- The beep out the cuss words!

Conker: Live and Cut

3 Rating: 3, Useful: 0 / 1
Date: October 12, 2005
Author: Amazon User

Give Nintendo credit, they may not be number 1 in sales, but they do start trends that everyone and their dog copies, whether it's analogue controls, or complete, and groundbreaking remakes of yester-generation's groundbreaking titles.
While the not-so-big-N was spending time getting remakes of Resident Evil, and the absolutely incredible Metal Gear Solid Microsoft decided to utilize their purchase of former Nintendo 2nd party Rare to make a remake of a ground breaking and revolutionary entry to the N64 era.
Conker's Bad Fur day was not a hit. It came out too late in the N64's lifecycle for it to be, most people were already looking toward the next generation. Those that were interested in the game tended to ask for "The squirrel game on the Playstation"; ever ignorant to the fact that Nintendo DOES target adults from time to time. Microsoft's theory was that Conker failed because it was on a Nintendo system.
It's little irony that this incarnation of the game isn't faring much better, but there's a substantially more explainable reason this time... Rare made some changes that just don't really work, or improve the game.
Graphically the game is a mixed bag. Though the polygon models, fur rendering and overall detail has been significantly improved over the original (It's beautiful) the game still has the usually 30 frames per second frame rate and somewhat choppy animation of the original. While this was fine during the N64 era, it's disappointing now that they didn't improve the animation at all. Overall, however, this is a vibrant and beautiful game, and one of the best looking games over all this generation. Rare definitely deserves some kudos for the amazing amount of detail this game contains.
Game play wise the avoid combat or solve puzzles to kill enemy tactic of the original (Minus the Spooky and saving Private Rodent sequence) was replaced with a choppy dual analogue with baseball bat combat engine that just didn't really work all that well. The combat was sloppy, repetitive and boring, even frustrating at points as the dual analogue system does not make for easy retreats, and I found myself impaled by the imps more often than not, or falling off of high places trying to get away after attacking because of the sluggish, and sloppy combat system. In the end, Rare should have left well enough alone. The Dual analogue control of the Saving Private Rodent scene was overly complex and made for a more frustrating experience than what the original offered, however, it did help the Spooky sequence, making it possible to aim much easier than I remember it being in the original. I'm not sure how or why it worked out that way for me, but it's did. Spooky benefited from the new combat engine, the rest of the game was made more frustrating.
Content wise the Xbox version suffers from severe censorship. I mean severe. Nintendo let Rare get a way with a lot more than Microsoft did, ironic, considering the market perceptions of the two. The sunflower now wears clothing, language is almost all bleeped out, and oddly, instead of the Tediz bleeding stuffing like in the original, they just bleed. The Electric Eel minigames is gone, as is the manned turret in Saving Private Rodent, but the most frustrating elements of the original (The race with the cavemen, in all it's cheap accidental death glory remains... stupid dinosaur getting in the way) as does the turret tower-tank segment, where you have a clear shot of the last pole, but can't peg it unless you're in a very specific, next to impossible to reach spot.
The original title was "Conker: Live and Uncut", with the loss of content, the irritating new combat engine, and all the censorship that took place Rare took a great game and made it mediocre. Little wonder it's not a blockbuster on this system. A note to Microsoft, take a cue from Nintendo, if you do a remake of a previous generation game, don't ruin it! Enhance it!
As far as the online player mode, it's really not much to speak of. It's disappointingly scarce in original content, again it suffers from a sluggish dual analogue control scheme, and has little to do besides running around killing, and being killed. Not much of an improvement over the multi-player games of the N64 original.
I hate to say it, but the stigmatism that remakes are seldom better than the original holds true here. In typical Hollywood fashion more eye candy does not mean better. The N64 original remains a classic, while this remains a cash cow.

conkr rules

5 Rating: 5, Useful: 0 / 9
Date: January 29, 2006
Author: Amazon User

conker is kick ass conker rocks go conker i'm geting tanked tonight conker live and realoaded rocks yeah conker rocks i love bad fur day i'm a conker fan

Fun and Funny

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 0 / 1
Date: April 06, 2007
Author: Amazon User

A overall fun game although it does take sometime to get a weapon. This is NOT a game for little kids make sure to follow the matuire rating. There is plenty of cursing and interesting behavior. Overall a good fun game

Review Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next 

Actions