User Reviews (1 - 11 of 25)

Show these reviews first:

Highest Rated
Lowest Rated Newest
Oldest Most Helpful
Least Helpful

Waste of time...

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 7 / 9
Date: December 12, 2002
Author: Amazon User

I love how people that havnt even played this game rate it 5 stars. The only reason i gave it one star is because that's the lowest you can select. This game was so horrible, the graphics were the worst i've ever seen on GBA, I am not cheap but I actually took this game back to the store where I bought it and demanded a refund. The missions in the game, a joke, you pretty much walk right into them. And walking around is even a joke, i've never seen such choppy framerate in a game in my life!! Also when you shoot your weapon it's so slow i'm surprised your not dead by the time you get your second shot off. My advice, dont waste your time or money on this game. I would compare this game to Duke Nukem Advance as Duke being a 10 outta 10 and Medal of Honor being a 1 out of Million!!!

Bad bad Bad

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 3 / 6
Date: February 22, 2003
Author: Amazon User

i am an experienced veterian with first person shooters and I have to admit that this is the worst on I have ever played. To me the worst part is the insane auto aim that takes away all chance to show any talent with shooting. The frame rate is very slow and the background is very bland. There is no real easy visible difference between nazis and a wall. And there is allways too much ammo, I tried as hard as i could and I wasn't able to get rid of it.

Words cant even begin to describe how bad this SUCKS!

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 2 / 4
Date: November 20, 2003
Author: Amazon User

You wouldn't even believe how bad "Medal of Honor: Underground" for the GBA sucks.

I've played MOH since the original on PSX snd have always loved each game in it's series, but this game for the GBA is downright horrible. We are talking "shouldn't even had been released" horrible.

Gameplay is horrible, jerky and slow action, graphics are terrible.

I don't know what the deal is with EA and their GBA games. Its obvious they don't put too much effort into development of GBA games. Madden 2004 is downright horrible on the GBA as well.

Buyer BEWARE

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 2 / 2
Date: March 02, 2004
Author: Amazon User

This game is horrific. The levels are linear and the choice of weapons is lacking. The graphics are so bad I cannot tell if I am shooting a guard or a wall. The graphics make your eyes hurt they are so bad. Most of the time I could not see where I was going. Luckily, I pretended like it didn't work and got a refund. The music is the only good part of this game. This is definately the worst game I have ever played. EVER.

A choppy, chunky, sluggish, First-Person Shooter!

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 2 / 3
Date: July 11, 2004
Author: Amazon User

Medal of Honor: Underground is the eleven best (second to the worst) FPS for GBA and the ninth released for the system. Medal of Honor: Underground looked promising for the GBA because the PS One version was so good. When I turned on the game I thought it wasn't so bad. Cut me some slack, I'm only reading the mission briefing! After I was done reading, the game started. What the heck am I looking at? These graphics are horrible, some of the worst I've seen on GBA. I liked how the other reviewer worded it, It was like sticking a turd in your Game Boy cartridge slot and flipping the on switch! That's pretty much the only way I can describe how bad the graphics are! After a while you get used to the chunky graphics and sluggish control and realize, okay, it's not that bad. The game features a good story, neat cut-scenes and varied objectives. This gives it more depth than the garden-variety shooter, ahem . . . Doom. This is definitly one of the worst FPSs for the GBA. Beware of the graphics!

Very sad indeed...........

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 0 / 2
Date: May 19, 2003
Author: Amazon User

Save your money. After playing Medal of Honor Frontline, this game is like a trip to the distant past. The graphics are like the drawings of a kindergarden child, and the ability to control the game is frustrating. I guess I was expecting the same super look of Frontline, and boy what a pathetic difference. I guess if you haven't reached the level of Frontline, it might be good as a intro, but I tried it, and tried it, and threw it in the trash. A learning experience....

GARBAGE

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 0 / 1
Date: November 24, 2004
Author: Amazon User

This game is GARBAGE. Avoid it at all cost. It's the biggest piece of @#$% I've ever had to play. and it's too bad because to the true MOH fan it would have been a nice take along but it's more of a leave behind.

sucks!!

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 0 / 3
Date: May 26, 2005
Author: Amazon User

graphics suck sounds suck and the graphics give you a huge huge HUGE head ake and you can see the bad guys when there on the other side of the wall, story sucks! everything sucks id rate it a -1000 if i cood p.s. DONT GET IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! not worth the price im going to throw mine in the garbage

One of the worst games ever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 1 / 1
Date: November 22, 2004
Author: Amazon User

This game is the worst games ever. The graphics suck and the gameplay sucks. If I were you I wouldent even look at this game. I played it at my friends house and it was bad. I recomend that you get meadal of honor infltrator now that game rocks. But dont get meadal of honor underground.

God awful

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 1 / 2
Date: January 14, 2005
Author: Amazon User

You think with games like doom and ecks vs server out they can make a decent fps for the gba, But nope not in this case. The single major flaw that ruins the game is the graphics. I mean i know its a gameboy and all but they are sooo bad, its like they tried making an fps on the NES. Walls dispear, patterns move making you dizzy. they enemys are just a blurr in the back ground. The objectives and idea are all pretty good but you can;t see anything t all. Try Doom

Review Page: 1 2 3 Next 

Actions