0
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z


Cheats
Guides


PC - Windows : Close Combat 4: The Battle of the Bulge Reviews

Below are user reviews of Close Combat 4: The Battle of the Bulge and on the right are links to professionally written reviews. The summary of review scores shows the distribution of scores given by the professional reviewers for Close Combat 4: The Battle of the Bulge. Column height indicates the number of reviews with a score within the range shown at the bottom of the column. Higher scores (columns further towards the right) are better.







User Reviews (1 - 11 of 35)

Show these reviews first:

Highest Rated
Lowest Rated
Newest
Oldest
Most Helpful
Least Helpful



Sound effects are great!

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 17 / 17
Date: December 05, 1999
Author: Amazon User

I've only started playing this game, but I immediately noticed the awesome sounds. Each weapon has it's own unique sound, with big blasts reverberating for several seconds. If you have good speakers with a subwoofer, you'll be amazed. The overhead view of the action helps to keep the player on top of things, however the graphics are rather small and it is sometimes hard to see damaged areas. I am not well-read on WWII tank strategies, but I have heard other people questioning the AI of the game. It seemed fine to me as a casual gamer. It is easy to learn the controls but very difficult in terms of strategy. Out of about 4 15-minute missions I've attempted so far on easy level, I've only won one and that was by a slight margin. Speaking of which the manual is very well written. It goes into tank strategies as well as a 5 page history of the Battle of the Bulge. Overall, it's a fun game with great sound effects. Also, my computer is a PII300 with 128MB of ram and a TNT2 graphics card and it runs fine.

The greatest war simulation of all time

5 Rating: 5, Useful: 13 / 14
Date: December 08, 1999
Author: Amazon User

I must start by agreeing fully with the man above, that the sound is INCREDIBLE. I do not have a subwoofer or any fancy sound system whatsoever... nonetheless, the sound was awesome. However, I must beg to differ with the comment that the AI isn't all that great. In fact, it is some of the best AI I have ever seen for a strategy game! The men having the brains to stay behind cover when under fire, fear, and exhaustion were all highly realistic. The graphics have also improved over the previous title. I must admit that the tanks are a little hard to maneuver... but can you see the original W.W.II tanks turning as fast as Command & Conquer? They have become a lot smarter and quicker at aiming than they were in number 2. To sum it all up, I'll just say that this game is HIGHLY recommended by me. And only if you love as realistic a war simulation as possible in a fast moving real-time environment should you buy it.

Awesome Game

5 Rating: 5, Useful: 14 / 16
Date: December 09, 1999
Author: Amazon User

If you've never played any of the games in the Close Combat series, you're missing out! The games are the most realistic stratigical recreation of WW2 battles. CC4 is the newest in the series and is centered around the Battle of the Bulge. In the game, you are in charge of a small set of teams (usually about 12) of solders. Each team has its own weapons and/or equipment. There are all kinds of weapons in the game but all are true-to-life and historically accurate. There is also the possibility to call in artillary birages and air strikes sometimes. All in all, the game is awesome and I highly recomend it. You can also play it online. And over LANs and modems. Buy the game if you like history, WW2, stratigy, or all of the above. If you don't, it's still a great game.

Another excellent game in the Close Combat series

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 13 / 13
Date: December 12, 1999
Author: Amazon User

This real-time strategy game is the best I have played from this genre. I have played all of the games in the Close Combat series, and many games of this type from other publishers. To date, I believe this is the best. If you have played any of the other Close Combat games, this one is pretty similar. One notable difference from the others is that attacks can come from any direction. Previous versions were far more predictable in that you always knew what direction the enemy would be comming from. In addition, this version takes into account morale and willingness to fight. Battles will cease if morale gets too low. One change that I did not like from the previous versions, is an inability to choose units to acquisition. A minor drawback for a game with many merits. Regardless of whether or not you have played other war strategy games, this one is an excellent choice.

Great game, but what happened to the Tigers?

5 Rating: 5, Useful: 15 / 16
Date: December 20, 1999
Author: Amazon User

I have the three close combat games that came before this one, and I also agree that this is the finest. I understand why they had to take away the feature that lets you pick your units, the Americans could'nt always have 5 shermans to fight with, I like the format. The addition of artillery and air strikes is icing on the cake. The only minor things I can say negatively about this game is the units. I have been playing since late November, and have not seen one Tiger tank! They might come later in the game but I have'nt seen it They played a big role in the ardennes. Second, the barrage consists of four mortars, I think 105mms would be a little more effective. Overral fun game!

Okay but

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 9 / 17
Date: January 05, 2000
Author: Amazon User

The best Close Combat game was Close Combat 2. A good balance between the forces beautifull graphics and the game illustrated the Arnem campaign.

Close Combat 3 was a big dissapointment. The only units which mattered were tanks.

Close Combat 4 is better than 3 and infantry units again are something more than cannon fodder. The negatives of the game are that the graphics are not as good as the previous two in the series. The game also crashes a lot.

As has been mentioned Tiger tanks never seem to appear.Instead the German player has thousands of armounred cars and small vehicles whose only function seems to be to blow up in a spectacular and regular way. The game also goes on forever. To compleat a long campaign takes over a week.

The A 1 is also somewaht unispired. The tanks controlled by the computer just mill around in an aimless way only firing at soft targets. Still sort of allright and streets aread of the last issue.

Close Combat 4:the Battle of the Bulge

5 Rating: 5, Useful: 10 / 11
Date: January 13, 2000
Author: Amazon User

I bought this game and did not expect much(never have bought any from microsoft before). I was surprised! Loads and plays easy. HIGHly recommended. Being a former Marine, the battle sequence moves very fluid and fast paced. The book that comes with it is short, sweet and to the point. You don't have to spend hours with a manual to play this game. A must for any real time gamer, or a good introduction to real time games.

Simply Put . . .

5 Rating: 5, Useful: 4 / 5
Date: January 31, 2000
Author: Amazon User

Simply put, this is the best Close Combat game from the series of four. There is no other way of describing or summarizing the game's overall appeal. If still not convinced, download the demo and enjoy the in-depth scope of military history from your desktop. Afterwards, you will feel compelled to engross yourself in the full version - it is that addictive. Simply put, Close Combat: The Battle of the Bulge is the best wargame for all ages on the market today.

Good game, but I liked CC3 better

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 34 / 36
Date: March 13, 2000
Author: Amazon User

Evere since I heard CC4 was going to be released, I could't wait to buy and play with it. But once I got my hands on it, I immediately noticed some weak areas. Being a Close combat series Hard Core Fan, I had already bought all the previous three titles, and found some plus and minuses, especially if compared with "The russian front" (CC3). MINUSES Units: Your battle groups have fixed types of units, meaning you cannot adjust your forces from defence to offence posture (those shermans seem to be useless in defence against german armor). In the end it gets very boring to play in the same map with the same units over and over again! In CC3 every battle is different, since you can adjust your forces each time. The detail offered in CC3 is also more specific going down to the single soldier level. This used to be useful both during battles and during the plannig phase, where you coluld notice that a particular soldier or unit had been with you for even a few years. In the end I found a tendency not to use the older units because I feared they colud get killed! BATTLES: Strategic overview means you will be playing over some maps over and over again, having to go thru a complete cycle before you can move your forces again. AI: THE AI IS MUCH MORE STUPID THAN IN CC3. I played the first time on the german side, and won every single battle. It does not like to move very much, even if winning. PLUSES Graphics: Better and more ralistic. Air & arty support: You now can call in support during the game. It gives some more flexibility, but not enough to have a real impact on the game. Strategic level: You now have a strategic level where you can move your battle groups around befor playing single battles. This feature adds depth to the game, but sometimes prevents flexible movement. One unit per square is too few, and makes transiting battle groups thru controlled maps impossible. You first have to move out any unit that is controlling the area, reconquer it with the new unit and then you can move to the offence. A pain if you are in the rear areas, a nightmare if you are moving on the front lines. This feature looks like something out of an AMIGA 500 strategy game. MY SUGGESTION: If you are a CC series fan, BUY IT, since it gives you a completely new battlefield to play on. If you never played a CC series game before, BUY CC3, a much better game overall.

disappointed

3 Rating: 3, Useful: 6 / 8
Date: April 01, 2000
Author: Amazon User

As a Close Combat fan, especially CC3, I was excited to get a copy of CC4-Battle of the Bulge. As others have said, it is nowhere near the level of CC3. You cannot select individual units, the AI is seriously flawed, and the same maps get used over and over-even if you "hold" an area after one battle...the computer will take it away from you the next time. Also, I have yet to see a Tiger or King Tiger tank. Why does the book even mention them? The game requires incredible patience as well; to complete the campaign takes days. I hardly ever play it anymore, and have reverted to CC3 for my wargaming.


Review Page: 1 2 3 4 Next 



Actions