User Reviews (1 - 11 of 16)

Show these reviews first:

Highest Rated
Lowest Rated Newest
Oldest Most Helpful
Least Helpful

A Poor Game From Eidos!!?!

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 14 / 19
Date: December 20, 2007
Author: Amazon User

Kane & Lynch is outdated fare for pc-gamers with years of experience speeding or slogging or sneaking through generations of FPS games. As far as ports go, it's not the most disappointing I've ever played (WHY DIDN'T HALO INCLUDE CO-OP!!!). K&L attempts to bring squad-based combat to the seedy crime story shooter sub-genre of gaming. It does not succeed. Unfortunately for its publishers, it is probably the least competitive FPS on the PC game market today.

(I don't know how good it looks on an x-box or PS3, and I don't really care. This is a PC game review, so if you love playing this game on your console, please observe that I am only reviewing the PC port of this game.)

The first problem with K&L is the poor AI. The AI controller feels ancient after playing S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chernobyl and Crysis. Opponents and teammates go straight to objective points (cover positions, good firing positions, or ordered destinations), without utilizing cover or providing covering fire. Also, your teammates sometimes, momentarily, stick on walls or cover while running past, which demonstrates, among other things, pathfinding problems in the AI.

The zoom/aim fire is severely outdated. Iron-sights have been an industry standard for years in the PC shooter market, and the fact that K&L uses an old mini-zoom with a crosshair change instead of well rendered iron sights significantly drops its comparative worth.

K&L's graphics appear last-gen or mediocre when compared to its competitors (Crysis, Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, and S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chernobyl). Even with tweaking to max the graphics on my machine, the K&L graphics weren't as smooth or realistic as any of the other three games listed. This might be harsh, but playing K&L right after finishing Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, the graphics in K&L were like cartoons.

Speaking of tweaks, this game actually required them. I personally take it as a bad sign when a game has problems playing on default settings in a system with better than recommended specs. I do tweak my games and hardware settings for performance, sound, and graphics enhancement, but a game should run smoothly, if not maxed out, when loaded onto a computer with better than recommended specs. K&L doesn't do that. I had to tweak my settings just to get it to run smooth. The publishers just rushed too hard, and compatibility suffered. This is poor coding like I haven't seen since Max Payne, that gem of a game, showed us all what good, tight code could do for a game.

Scripting in K&L is much less than smooth. Enemies can spawn three feet in front of the player if one moves too quickly for the heavily scripted AI to keep up. For example, I took the left hand slope/path toward the docks from the church. Unfortunately, I moved to the exit too quickly for the game to register, so it spawned five enemies right on top of me. Poof, there they were. This should never happen. I haven't seen spawns this visible since the 90's. More than anything else, multiple bugs of this kind, throughout the game, demonstrate very, very poor scripting.

Squad controls are extremely limited. The game doesn't allow you to hotkey the squad command submenu orders or hotkey individuals in your squad. This might sound like nitpicking, but there have been some really good squad command control structures offered in squad based PC titles over the past five years, and the K&L team didn't use any of them. In the end, the squad based controls, especially when combined with poor AI pathfinding, where more frustrating than helpful. I ended up just beating the game using ancient run and gun tactics, and only using the squad commands when they were required.

Combat controls also suffer. The fire-from-cover feature is a cool addition to gaming, but please let us control our character. Titles in the Splinter Cell, Metal Gear, or Gears of War series allow you to key into and out of cover in their control systems. Having crates or walls GRAB you when you're trying to walk away from them is really annoying. So, in this area, K&L falls short of both old and new titles.

Finally, the game is way too short. Frankly, for fifty bucks, I expect twelve hours of straight through game-play at a minimum. I don't appreciate sitting down during the week to warm up for some serious weekend game-play, only to beat the game in under five hours. It was sad. Even with all of the frustrations, bugs, and annoyances, the game didn't take up more time than a DVD movie with a decent set of special features. This, more than anything else, makes me say that this game isn't worth more than $20-$25, which is about what you would pay for audio-visual entertainment lasting between 4 and 5 hours.

I cannot recommend Kane & Lynch: Dead Men for any attribute except a decent attempt at having a story line of sorts. It is surpassed by other new FPS games on the PC market in all aspects of game design, play, and visual effects. The best FPS games on the PC market are currently Crysis, Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, BioShock, and S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chernobyl. These are all great games in different ways. They all do some really new things, or revamp old stuff in new and extremely improved ways. So, if you have to have a really good FPS this year get one of them, and leave Kane & Lynch on the shelf.

once again the "games for windows" logo means it won't work as expected

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 8 / 9
Date: December 18, 2007
Author: Amazon User

Like a schmuk I thought that going to vista with my new HO(P) d4790y would mean a happy gaming experience with my new-ish Gforce 8600GTS with 640mb of RAM, my numerous cores of intelligence, my 4 gig of RAM (Yes, the kinfunts at HP sold me 4 when the OS can only see 3.. law suit anyone ?)
Any way, once again the "for Windows" slogo on the box persuaded me to buy the game, only to find after dicking about for a whole evening that the window they refer to is "throw this crap out of the window in anger" no hope of making it run on Vista.

AVOID THIS GAME. I even tried to run it on my lame old XP SP2 machine with a decent enough ATI card and it failed to function..

I also downloaded all the newest NVIDIA drivers. After the first install failed, it would not complete, I removed K and L and reinstalled the drivers, faced numerous system hangups.. Thanks EIDOS, you are the next best thing to a virus, you lame frigers.

A really BAD port !!!

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 19 / 36
Date: November 28, 2007
Author: Amazon User

This game is actually pretty terrible on Windows. It is more fun on the XBOX, but definitely not on Windows. This game is a port, which means it was designed to run on a console but was "tweaked" to make it run on a PC. This is almost never a good thing to do! This time, it is down right horrible.

The graphics are outdated, the camera angles are terrible, you have to survive between save spots which the game does automatically for you, the gun fights are the same thing over and over. VERY repetitive and so obvious you can predict the attacks every time. Not to be mean, but I think the other reviewers here must have been under 15 years old, because only someone so young could still be satisfied by a game this lame.

The voice acting is forced, the story line is good but who cares about story lines? If you are going to pay $45, do you really want a story line or do you want a good FPS???!!!

The game play is not as smooth as it should be. You cling to walls when you don't want to, fight the camera to get good shooting angles, your teammates get in the way constantly or the shoot you apart and at times they cannot hit the broad side of a ware house! It is not easy to control your men or position them either. This requires some complicated keyboard combos that are not easy when you are getting pounded by some ridiculously accurate at times bad guys!!

Bad cut scenes, that some times you cannot skip past. UGGGHH!
Bad game play.
Bad voice acting.
Bad, out dated graphics.
Bad camera angles.
Bad keystroke combos.
Bad bugs that cause the story to halt at times.
BAD.
BAD.
BAD.

Not worth $15 in the discount bin. Don't bother with this until it is less than $15. Why blow $45 on this when COD 4, Crysis, UT 3, Time Shift and many others are out there that will definitely provide much more entertainment for you and higher replay value!

Wish I hadn't purchased

2 Rating: 2, Useful: 5 / 5
Date: January 12, 2008
Author: Amazon User

I purchased this game because of the connection with the Hitman series which was enjoyable. I wish I hadn't wasted the money. It's buggy and the inability to skip past cut scenes after death gets really frustrating. The story is alright and somewhat entertaining but there are many other titles which are much better, while not 3rd person shooters I'd check out Bioshock, Call of Duty 4, Crysis, the Witcher, The Orange Box (team fortress 2, and portal), etc.

Kane & Lynch:Dead men

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 6 / 7
Date: December 03, 2007
Author: Amazon User

I never got a chance to play this game because it wouldn't work on my PC,don't know why cause according to the specs,I meet all the requirements.Now I'm stuck with this game and no one wants to give me a refund

Don't Even Bother

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 6 / 8
Date: December 24, 2007
Author: Amazon User

Don't waste your money on this unless you enjoy replaying the same levels over and over and over and over again with no room for strategy nor FPS tactics in the most primitive sense.

Graphics are severely outdated by today's standards and the box says "coop" mode when what you get is the ability to play coop via a split screen on one pc???

This really irked me since I bought two copies of the game to play over our LAN. $100 bucks totally wasted for what amounts to a $12 game like maybe five years ago.

Eidos might have thought it slick to trick LAN users like us by FALSELY advertising COOP mode just to get you to buy multiple copies but guess what? NEVER EVER AGAIN EIDOS!

We buy an average of four to seven games a month and Eidos will never be any of them.

The other thing is the amount of gratuitous foul language used in this game for practically any line--after a while it feels like your surrounded by angry poor inner city kids cursing left and right at anything.

Don't be fooled people, just because it says Games for Windows with the Windows logo and all of that, it doesn't equate to a quality game at all.

AVOID THIS AT ALL COST EVEN IF YOU HAVE MONEY TO THROW AWAY--this is one of the worst titles for 2007!

A game that could have been so much more

3 Rating: 3, Useful: 4 / 4
Date: December 04, 2007
Author: Amazon User

Man, this game is frustrating. Not because it isn't fun (because it is), but because of missed opportunities. I am a big Michael Mann fan, and as far as story/visuals go, this game delivers. Unfortunately for me, technical issues and sometimes frustrating AI ruined the overall experience.

I cannot play this game without a crash. It crashes and I see the 'send a report to MS' window. Fortunately I can alt-tab back into the game and play unhindered. I recently did a full Windows format and reinstall and still receive the error, so unless it's a random configuration problem with my machine...also, Eidos Support has no idea what is wrong and tells me to replace the media. Well, others in the official and unofficial forums have the exact same issue, and we can't figure out any commonalities. I also receive random crashes to desktop on level loading.

As far as AI, sometimes they find cover and sometimes they do not. In my experience they rarely act smart, merely adequate at best. Many times I will order someone behind cover only to see them sit NEXT to the cover out in the open. They die very quickly. And this is on medium difficulty. I don't remember having this much frustration with the AI in Freedom Fighters. No, this AI definitely needs tweaking, but it's close to what it needs to be. As it stands, seeing the AI stand out in the open while they get shot ruins the immersion.

I really wanted to love this game. Although some are bashing the graphics, I think the graphical style overall is very good. It has a gritty, hazy style that I feel fits perfectly with the overall mood and I think the textures look great. Is it as beautiful as Crysis? No, but it's still very good. The aiming is great on the PC, and the weapons feel awesome. The sound is amazing, and the voice acting and writing are great. The gameplay is overall straightforward, but that doesn't bother me. Yes, you just move from cover to cover and shoot it out with cops. That's why I bought the game.

Honestly, if the technical issues were fixed and the AI was tightened up then I would easily recommend this to everyone who would listen. The time I spent playing was overall enjoyable. As it stands, however, I can only say 'proceed with caution'.

A little more?

2 Rating: 2, Useful: 4 / 4
Date: December 29, 2007
Author: Amazon User

I had a blast anticipating this game and going along with all the hyped in the media. Although this excitement ended after the final scene in the game.

My expectations for the game were far too great for what is at hand. Don't get me wrong, the parts where you get to mow down scores of baddies in one mission is quite thrilling. Though there is no re-playability to the game as a whole! I played the game through in 6 hours, looking under every rock, tree, room, building, etc., and there's nothing for me to go back to. It's like a B movie, maybe if they have additions to this game in the future, you can see this game as a piece in the puzzle. Though for now, it is just piece #1 in a thousand.

The repetitive death audio clips can annoy you after you die 50 times because you cannot locate the baddie in time for his sniper bullet. Controls are designed for a console controller. In this game I was expecting at least a few bosses to fight against, but all in all there were none except for the ending. :/

The PLUS side to this game is that it does have a few exciting moments and the banter between Kane and Lynch is quite humorous. Also the group controlling is fun, but has been done better elsewhere. If they would have added a few more scenes and actually ended the game's storyline better, I would give it a higher score.

That's my motto for this game is: buy it, beat it, sell it. Cheers!

An Extremely Poor Effort From IO Interactive

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 5 / 7
Date: December 04, 2007
Author: Amazon User

This most recent game from the makers of Hitman proves to be one of the more disappointing games I have experienced in recent years. The controls are horrible, the characters are unlikeable, the AI is abysmal, and the graphics look like a first generation PS2 game. Even more perplexing is that the game is based around coop between the two title characters yet the game doesn't feature any online coop.

Also be warned that the publisher of this game, Eidos, has recently recieved a lot of bad press for trying to bribe their way to higher review scores and even using outright bogus reviews to promote their game. Anyone who does not want to encourage such behaviour should not financially support this product.

In conclusion, stay as far away from this one as you can.

Not as good as videos/previews made it out to be

2 Rating: 2, Useful: 4 / 5
Date: December 18, 2007
Author: Amazon User

I was really hyped up for the game by the videos and previews. The actual game is glitchy and not very well optimized. I'd buy it for 20 bucks, but not full price.

Review Page: 1 2 Next 

Actions