User Reviews (1 - 11 of 131)

Show these reviews first:

Highest Rated
Lowest Rated Newest
Oldest Most Helpful
Least Helpful

i liked part 2 better though

3 Rating: 3, Useful: 0 / 1
Date: April 22, 2008
Author: Amazon User

this game was great but i perfer part2 but on the other hand they were quite the same but this game was good i beat it like part2 i did'nt play part1 but this was good.

Call of duty 3

3 Rating: 3, Useful: 0 / 0
Date: April 07, 2008
Author: Amazon User

The graphics are better than Call of duty 2. The overall game should have been more complex and longer.

Good but not awesome

3 Rating: 3, Useful: 0 / 0
Date: March 21, 2008
Author: Amazon User

The condition and shipping speed were great.. Theirs nothing wrong with the seller highly reccomended.. The product was a let down though.. The first two were awesome for pc.. But this game is a major let down if you've played Call of Duty 4.. But all in all its got good multi-player.. The vehicles are stupid as they dont take damage when you fall off a cliff or collide into a wall or another vehicle..

ITS the best game in the world

5 Rating: 5, Useful: 0 / 0
Date: February 18, 2008
Author: Amazon User

You can make no mistakes buying this game. The ghrapices are amazing i sometimes think its better than cod4.
Its better then gears of war and halo one,two,and thee. the bottem line is its rocks. There are a lot of wepansons

single player; super fun
muiltiplayer; ROCKS
WEPANSONS; awsome

Fun Game, online play dwindelling

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 0 / 0
Date: February 14, 2008
Author: Amazon User

I really love the single player. Online play is fun, but slowing since Call of Duty 4 has come out. Still recommended for $20 or less, fun war game.

Along the same lines as Call of Duty 2

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 0 / 0
Date: February 08, 2008
Author: Amazon User

Part 3 is a fine continuation of the franchise. I prefer playing first person shooters with a keyboard and mouse, but since this game is only available for consoles you have to embrace the awkward manipulation of the game via the 360 controller.

Online play is awesome.

An entirely different World War II game...

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 0 / 0
Date: January 29, 2008
Author: Amazon User

...compared to Call of Duty 2.

Where another user called Call of Duty 3 a big expansion pack of Call of Duty 2, I see it as not only another game, but another series altogether. This is due probably to the change in companies who produced the game.

Compared to Call of Duty 2, COD3 feels like it comes from a different franchise. About the only similarities with the original are the same controls, map, and grenade detection. The graphics are neither superior nor inferior to Call of Duty 2, but the weapons are completely re-done, and have new sounds to them altogether.

The missions do feel less stimulating, focused more on following the obvious terrain design to go and kill more Nazis, and occasionally get into contests over your rifle with them, in which you must press buttons back and forth to overpower them.

Multiplayer is much more frustrating here than in COD2, as a new weapon can be picked, a rocket launcher, and vehicles can be used. This leads to people immediately going for tanks, and proceeding to make the map hell on others either not quick enough to destroy the tanks, or feel that a game based on infantry battles should maybe be fought with infantry, and not exclusively in tanks.

Also adding to multiplayer difficulty is the new sniper scope. Some of the positive reviewers complain that the sniper scopes in Call of Duty 2 make the sniper rifle into something of a superweapon, with flawless aim and one-hit kills. I disagree entirely in that while it is easy to master, it's also easy to counter, and Call of Duty 3 disrupts this balance by not retaining the old sniper scope system, and not bothering to design a new sniper scope system. Instead, they retain the same sniper scope for ALL sniper rifles, and make it so not only does it wobble far more than in Call of Duty 2, but after letting out your breath from holding it in, your scope flies wildly out of place for no real reason, and takes a moment to re-align.

On a plus side, rather than dwell in the same territory as other World War II games, you get to play as Polish and Canadian troops.

DON'T PASS ON THIS ONE!!!

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 0 / 0
Date: January 21, 2008
Author: Amazon User

IF you havent experienced any of the call of duty series, you havent experience war games at their best. A step above and beyond the linear gameplay from call of duty 2. You controll several soldiers from diferent countries all fighting their way to freedom from the NAZI party. The ability to controll tanks and drive jeeps definately took this game up into the ranks of legendary games like Halo.

The online feature is very unique. Huge worlds filled with endless other players. You can be one of 7 figures in a multiplayer game. Anything from a soldier, scout, Medic, or explosive expert to name a few.

I would definately recomend this game to anyone who hasnt experienced it yet and needs a break from Call of Duty 4.

Wonderful world war fun

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 0 / 0
Date: January 02, 2008
Author: Amazon User

Excellent game, realistic aiming and lots of interaction as well as a small but spicy plot, multiplayer is a blast as well, whether playing with a friend or online with many options as far as game play and weapons!

Fun gameplay amidst frustration

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 0 / 0
Date: December 24, 2007
Author: Amazon User

The actual gameplay is a lot of fun on here. however, the problem is the long and drawn out cinematics. you can't skip them, no matter how many times you've played the game. you just have to sit helplessly as they drone on and on. there are also a few glitchy places where you can get stuck, only being able to turn around in a circle but not actually walk anywhere. that forces you to start over and....watch the cinematics again!

Review Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next 

Actions