Below are user reviews of Ultima Online: The Second Age and on the right are links to professionally written reviews.
The summary of review scores shows the distribution of scores given by the professional reviewers for Ultima Online: The Second Age.
Column height indicates the number of reviews with a score within the range shown at the bottom of the column.
Higher scores (columns further towards the right) are better.
Summary of Review Scores |
| | | | | | | | | |
0's | 10's | 20's | 30's | 40's | 50's | 60's | 70's | 80's | 90's |
User Reviews (1 - 11 of 36)
Show these reviews first:
I Needed to Gargle to get the bad taste out of my mouth
1
Rating: 1,
Useful: 7 / 16
Date: December 01, 1999
Author: Amazon User
This game is awful. On a 56k modem, the game paused about every three steps to load what everyone else did. The controls are numerous and confusing. It is hard to start, and nobody will stop running around like idiots for a second to answer a simple question. It is also easy to get lost and the game has no point. An all around bad game.
Not as good as could be
1
Rating: 1,
Useful: 4 / 4
Date: January 10, 2000
Author: Amazon User
The game is very addictive this is true, It has the potential to be great, however don't expect to do all the things it claims. Yes you have the option to buy houses in the game but the land space is limited and there is simply no more room for them. Yes you can use a meriod of skills but you are limited to how many and how high you can get them. Skill gain is slow and mindlessly reparative, yes some skills can be raised while adventuring but most are raised by siting there and performing the same action over and over. You'll spend long periods of time building skill. Skills points are raised in increments of .1% 100% being the goal and at the higher levels it can take many hours to gain just .1% and you can be banned for using an outside program to macro skills. The mechanics of the game change from month to month this is due to the constant tinkering by the administrators at times it'll be like playing a beta. Grand improvements are slow (they've been promising necromancy for two years) while minor changes are added and removed at an annoying rate(things like the way skills are gained and weather offensive magic can be used in town ,that one changed 3 times). Finally in-game support is there for only the most miniscule of problems (you get stuck in a server crack and can't move) but for most anything else the game masters are useless and right down rude.
Having problems sleeping? Try this game.
1
Rating: 1,
Useful: 3 / 9
Date: January 23, 2000
Author: Amazon User
I purchased Ultima Online because I was very bored with Diablo and Baldur's gate. I have been waiting several months now for Diablo 2, which blizzard can't seem to get released which is really pi$$ing me off, but that's another story. Anyway, I started playing U.O. and thought that it was really an awesome game. If you overlook the sub-standard graphics the game is kind of cool. I got some armor, better weapons and went off into the woods. About 10 minutes later some jerk killed me for no reason. This is pretty much the way things go in the UO world. I guess if you take 4 months of steady play, about 40 hours a week of character developement you MIGHT make grandmaster level and actually be able to do something. If you like repeating the same task over and over for about 4 months then this game is for you. However, if you like a fast paced game where you can actually accomplish something in a couple of weeks and don't fall asleep at the keyboard then don't buy this boring piece of something other than software. Nice going origin, way to make a game that really SUCKS! Maybe next time you could make the game take a full year of character developement before you can actually play it. In a nutshell this game is for a bunch of 10 year old pre-pubescent computer geeks that get off on who can kill more people and who's house is bigger.
Endless problem
1
Rating: 1,
Useful: 2 / 3
Date: March 03, 2000
Author: Amazon User
I play this game for 8 month and had to stop playing because of extremely bad customer support and endless connection problem. I disagree with critics of UO on subject of "Pking" only Player vs Player combat make this game worth to play other wise game like EQ much much better. WORNING: TECHNICAL REQUERMENTS ARE NOT REAL IT'S BARE MINIMUM. BE AWARE OF ADDITIONAL COST! YOU MAY NEED TO BUY 3RD PARTY SOFTWARE AND BOOKS SINCE OFFICIAL MANUAL AND WEB SIDE DON'T GIVE ALL INFORMATION YOU NEED TO PLAY SUCCESSFULLY AND ENJOY GAME. I have a cable modem and PII 350 cpu 128 RAM but connection so bad I couldn't connect for a week! To close to me server on east cost! I play on German shard for same time but connection became so bad that I had to stop and Origin refuse to move me to other shard. It's just too much problems to enjoy this game.
I used to Love this game .. now .. well its a sad story ...
2
Rating: 2,
Useful: 23 / 24
Date: January 27, 2000
Author: Amazon User
I have been playing RPGs since I can remember. I Love them. From DnD to MUDS to Everquest and Asheron's Call not to mention the myriad of single player RPGs I've played, I have always enjoyed them. Then came UO (Ultima Online). I began playing UO the first month it was released. The world was new, and it felt huge compared with other computer games I had played. I remember countless hours hunting in dungeons with friends. I played for over a year, but unfortunately technology passed UO by, and the culture deteriorated to random mass killings and basically pure anarchy.
ONE: I love the diversity of professions/skills and other aspects of the variety of skills available. In UO you can become a chef, or a blacksmith or a scribe, or any of several other professions. This is really unique to UO as the other MMRPGs out there don't do professions nearly as well if at all. This aspect of the game adds a sense of "realism" of the world.
TWO: The anarchy in UO is too much to handle. Basically in UO there are no laws. If you wish to walk up to someone in the wilderness, kill them and take whatever they have on them, go for it. The only repercussion is that you will become known as a murderer and will have a slower time of resurrecting and what-not. Origin never understood that if player killers are allowed to walk the land, then they should have a legal system, court system, and prisons. That same player that killed you will be "out on the streets" again in a day or two. This is the largest flaw in UO that I can see. Innocent citizens are not protected from random killings except in town. In town, guards will kill anyone who attacks you, but there are loopholes that the PKrs (player-killers) know about and exploit to avoid the guards.
THREE: the graphics in UO are severely behind the times so much so that they bring down the over-all play experience. Essentially in UO there are no 3-D elements whatsoever, and your view of the world is an isometric (almost top-down) view of your character and immediate surroundings. The trees and undergrowth all look alike, and the monster graphics are quite limited with minimal animations. In essence, the graphics are abysmal compared to today's standards.
FOUR: The economic system in UO is in disarray. When I first started playing UO, a small house cost me 4000 gold. Now, nearly 3 years later it is over 1 million gold. If we had that kind of inflation IRL (in real life) governments would collapse and anarchy would take over. Even if you can afford to buy a house, there is no land left where you can actually place it, so the idea of housing., although a great idea and unique to UO vs Everquest and Asheron's Call, is unusable in its current form in UO.
FIVE: Character development. UO is completely a skill-based system. This means to improve something you must do it over and over and over and over (you get the idea). This would be OK except that origin has all sorts of skill caps so that at some point you cap out and are afraid of even seeing someone make bake a cake as it may raise your baking skill which would automatically lower your hard-earned, cap'ed-out, magic skill. Essentially once you reach the caps you have nothing to strive for. The other MMRPG games allow you to almost indefinitely strive for new heights giving you one more goal to continue to game for.
SIX: Cheating. It is well known that there are "cheat" programs available for UO. Inevitably the same characters randomly killing other characters in the wilderness are using these to gain an unfair advantage. Also, because of these and other "macro" programs available. It is possible to "cap" a brand new character in a matter of days. "Cap" means to get a character trained in skills all the way to their maximums. The fact that it can be done in a few days is distressing to other players wishing to enjoy a more level playing field and to actually earn the skills vs. using macro programs to get the skills maxed.
SUMMARY: If you already have a large group of friends playing that you can use to help protect you, if you like the idea of professions, and you have some extra cash burning a hole in your pocket, perhaps give UO a shot. However, due to the anarchy, the terrible graphics, and the overall player culture, I do not recommend this game to anyone looking for an enjoyable on-line RPG experience. My suggestion is to try Asheron's Call and perhaps even Everquest, NOT UO
What a nightmare
2
Rating: 2,
Useful: 5 / 5
Date: March 04, 2000
Author: Amazon User
Let me start by saying this COULD have been a great game. It has decent graphics, a decent interface, and a really awesome skill system.
Other than that forget it, the skill system is so easily maniuplated by macroing, basically you could have a Grand Master in less than a week. And everyone basically makes up the same tank/mage with the same exact skills or else you are basically dogmeat to the PK's.
PK's are Player Killers. Some say they are 'roleplaying' killers, but when a guy named Vanilla Ice or SwEEtPiMp decides to kill you for no reason and loot all your belongings, all feelings of roleplaying go out the window. It seems 3 out of 4 people open up every conversation with "Corp Por" which basically means you are going to die unless you can run away without the lag 'rubberbanding' you back within their range.
The game is overrun with childish "DooDz" who have nothing better to do than to ruin the game for everybody else. They get their kicks off of killing someone and then taunting them afterwards. Sounds like a case of the bullied becoming a bully, only difference is they are hiding behind their monitor free to do and say whatever they want to make themselves feel better.
I've played just about every online game thats out now and I can easily say that Ultima Online has to be the worst as far as enjoyment goes. There are just too many kids who are out to upset people, the players ruined this game.
Everquest is a step up but again there are quite a number of "DooDz" who act childish and immature ruining what could be a great game.
Asheron's Call on the other hand seems to have a pretty good player base of mature people. Dont get me wrong there ARE "LeeT D()()D$" who play it, but it isn't nearly as bad as the other 2 mentioned games.
So I'd skip Ultima Online and Everquest and probably put my money with Asheron's Call. You'll thank me later =)
Fun for awhile
3
Rating: 3,
Useful: 6 / 7
Date: March 08, 2000
Author: Amazon User
I enjoyed Ultima Online immensely when I first started playing over two years ago. There is a wide variety of activities in which your character can participate including spell casting, tailoring, blacksmithing and joining a guild. The world is large and diverse and it's fun to interact with real people from all over the world. Player killers can be an annoying inconvenience if you enjoy traveling outside of towns but luckily aren't too numerous. In my opinion, money is too easily obtained making items worth very little. You can literally gate travel or 'recall' from bank to bank, city to city, picking up items dropped by other characters and make a profitable living! Also, the graphics, although attractive, are now outdated. My experience with online GM help was very positive, unlike the horror stories I was told. In conclusion, this game was fun for awhile but lost it's appeal over time. Then again, that can be said about most games, right?
Note there is a montly fee.
3
Rating: 3,
Useful: 0 / 0
Date: December 08, 1998
Author: Amazon User
I've only just started experimenting with this game; and it seems great so far. Unfortunately you must pay a ~$10/month fee to play. A shame they won't just sell a server version...
great if u got the right equipment
4
Rating: 4,
Useful: 6 / 9
Date: September 12, 1999
Author: Amazon User
Great game, if u got the right hardware and software to run it, u can only play it online, u haveto pay $10 a month to play it and u cant run it on AOL. other than that it's an awsome game, total person to person interface, thousands of options great game
classic
4
Rating: 4,
Useful: 1 / 7
Date: September 11, 1999
Author: Amazon User
this game is classic when it comes to role playing. You are part pf the town, the forest and the world. Everything you do is what makes up your online home, and it takes lots of time and effort to even build up that skill level enough to be great. It's hard work, but in the end it pays off and you get to do some really cool stuff! hehehe. I play on Napa Valley, and I belong to the guild RFO
Review Page:
1 2 3 4 Next
Actions