User Reviews (141 - 151 of 217)

Show these reviews first:

Highest Rated
Lowest Rated Newest
Oldest Most Helpful
Least Helpful

This game is ok

3 Rating: 3, Useful: 3 / 27
Date: November 14, 2001
Author: Amazon User

This game is not the best. i'm glad it's out. I just ordered one. It has lots of different classes of ships, and lots of warping your ships around. Also there is a really cool Borg campaign. Besides that everything suxs.

Too Many Bugs!

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 1 / 5
Date: September 14, 2003
Author: Amazon User

This game is full of bugs, even after the latest patch. Gameplay is simply ruined by all of progamming flaws, such as lock-ups. Even some game objectives are dead ends. Some missions on this game are unconquerable thanks to the poor programming. [its not worth the price that i paid and is not worth considerably less]

Way to many bugs. . .

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 1 / 5
Date: October 05, 2002
Author: Amazon User

I was exited about the game, but could not get it to run long enough to enjoy it.

Activision was unwilling to assist in troubleshooting, but Best Buy was nice enough to take the bug ridden game back.

To bad because it started out good till it kept crashing.

how the mighty have fallen...short.

2 Rating: 2, Useful: 1 / 5
Date: September 16, 2007
Author: Amazon User

the first Elite Force was ground breaking and a good FPS for its time (2000 a.d.) but this game just stinks. it fell short of every expactation i had. first off the game is too short. only 10-11 missions, i finished in 2 days. second, this game IS NOT Star Trek, its just another monster fighting FPS...soooooo dissapointing. i wanna fight Borg, Romulans, cardassians and other Alpha quadrent foes...not monsters...if i wanted monsters id pick up Doom. the one thing that was okay in the game were the weapon choices and the fact it takes place in the alpha quadrent on the Enterprise. dont waste your money like i did, im 50$ out.

This Could Have Been Better

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 1 / 6
Date: March 07, 2003
Author: Amazon User

For starters, for those of you who want to try, this game does not install on Intel Celeron processors. Secondly, this game is fun for about two hours and then becomes tedious and boring. If the Taldren/Activison alliance wanted to put out a "good" game, then they should have spent more time beta testing ( gee, other software companies do it so why shouldn't they ).

Orion Pirates

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 1 / 6
Date: July 23, 2005
Author: Amazon User

A great game with more features than I was expecting. You don't have to play the pirates, you can join any other original empires in the game. There are dozens (hundreds?) of ships available so the game never gets dull - there is always something new to try.

A taste of the past

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 1 / 10
Date: October 08, 2000
Author: Amazon User

I think that you'll like this gaem if you're into satr trek. It doesn't have the greatest graphics but it is supposed to be old

did not work

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 1 / 12
Date: July 23, 2005
Author: Amazon User

Star Trek Empires At War did not work, they have sent me two
and neither one worked because authintication protocal number
did not work...... so dont waste your time.

Star Trek: Starfleet Command II: Orion Pirates Review

3 Rating: 3, Useful: 1 / 14
Date: November 25, 2005
Author: Amazon User

Overall, this game was a meduim on the scale. One big plus is that it doesn't require the original Star Trek: Startfleet Command II to run. But, the graphics were poor, and the lack of a substantial storyline had a major inpact. Also, there were many variations on ship classes. It gets confusing, remembering which ship you bought when.
If I had a choice, I would use my money on the next game up, Star Trek: Starfleet Command III. It removes most of the flaws mentioned above, and it has a very good replay value. If you have any questions, comments, or concerns, please feel free to email me at cloudmouse@gmail.com. Thank you!
Ryan :-p

ADDICTIVE!!! (But Buggy!)

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 0 / 3
Date: July 05, 2003
Author: Amazon User

I played this game ad infnitum; the gameplay and graphics are great, although I wish that the economic model wasn't so stingy with the X-Generation ships. I found that an XCA or XCB was more than a match for just about any battleship. The Romulan, Gorn and Hydran X-ships were the best (the Romulan and Gorn varients tended to copy each other), while I found the ISC to be good in concept, but underpowered, the Mirak and Klingon just okay, the Federation variants a bit hard to master - but well worth the effort - and the Lyran X-varients decidedly inferior. The game tended to crash if you were playing either as a part of the pirate cartels or against them, and if you were playing as the Lyrans and used your ESG's to ram, the game would generate an aural artifact that would continue well after the end of the scenrio. Still, all in all, a better game than SFC II due to the inclusion of the X-Ships.

Review Page: Previous 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next 

Actions