0
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z




Game Cube : Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Reviews

Gas Gauge: 51
Gas Gauge 51
Below are user reviews of Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon and on the right are links to professionally written reviews. The summary of review scores shows the distribution of scores given by the professional reviewers for Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon. Column height indicates the number of reviews with a score within the range shown at the bottom of the column. Higher scores (columns further towards the right) are better.

Summary of Review Scores
0's10's20's30's40's50's60's70's80's90's


ReviewsScore
Game Spot 55
Game FAQs
IGN 45
GameSpy 40
GameZone 64






User Reviews (11 - 21 of 26)

Show these reviews first:

Highest Rated
Lowest Rated
Newest
Oldest
Most Helpful
Least Helpful



Ghost recon

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 3 / 7
Date: March 22, 2003
Author: Amazon User

I think this was a 4 and 1/2

the graphics where good good gameplay good 2 player co-op and good snigle play but over its not as good as the pc version i recommend it 4 the pc

Not the best FPS available.

3 Rating: 3, Useful: 3 / 7
Date: April 28, 2003
Author: Amazon User

GHOST RECON manages to keep a pretty even pace with its only competition, CONFLICT: DESERT STORM. You manage a squad of four soldiers, and all of them must stay alive. Unlike CONFLICT: DESERT STORM, all of the missions are pretty similar.

Mulitplayer is good for split-screen, but there is no online play. If you want to play online, buy SOCOM on PS2. Split-screen multiplayer is actually pretty good here; better than MEDAL OF HONOR: FRONTLINE or CONFLICT: DESERT STORM.

Single player is just not as exciting. MEDAL OF HONOR has an awesome single-player experience, but if you own that, check out THE SUM OF ALL FEARS, SPLINTER CELL, or the upcoming RAINBOW SIX 3. Graphics are behind those of RED FACTION II or SPLINTER CELL.

In the end, GHOST RECON is not a bad game, but there are better games available.

want a good game?.This is it.

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 2 / 4
Date: November 21, 2003
Author: Amazon User

this game is th best game ever
1.extremly realistic.2mush weapons than ever.extremely cool.
BAD THINGS:NOTHING! THIS GAME ROCKS.

It's worth playing.

5 Rating: 5, Useful: 1 / 2
Date: July 01, 2006
Author: Amazon User

This is the best squad-based, military-themed games that I have played. In single-player mode, one can direct the other squad with general commands; and, rotate between squads thereby using squad-level tactics. The weapons are based on actual models and present nuances distinct to each. For example, the high-caliber sniper rifles have a notable kick...if you're using a ruble-pack. In addition, the automatic weapons' accuracy diminish with sustained fire. The graphics are fine but the realistic details are noteworthy, e.g., subtle sound effects. I'm a Political Science graduate student so the story line is interesting: it's Tom Clancy's characteristic plausible scenarios for international-militarized crises. I completed the game two weeks ago and am still replaying various levels: I like it.

The best army game ever created!

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 1 / 3
Date: January 18, 2003
Author: Amazon User

This game has good environments and good graphics.If you buy it you wont regret it.It also a good game to play with your friends.Its the best [money] you will ever spent .

This Game is Horrible

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 1 / 4
Date: September 29, 2003
Author: Amazon User

Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon looked amazing, the back of the case said improved graphics from the PC version, added things and it would keep you sweating. I beat the game on hard in 4 days. The day after i bought the game i went to my friends house and played Conflict Desert Storm. That game is way better, graphic wise, game wise, and its not EASY. Ghost Recon is not as good as it says it is so i say dont waste your money on it!!

For Gamecube? Really?

5 Rating: 5, Useful: 2 / 20
Date: November 01, 2002
Author: Amazon User

When I first saw the Ghost Recon game for Gamecube on Amazon, I was excited, but also skeptical. I realize that writing a "review" for a game that I know nothing about at the moment is stupid, I can't help but hope that it does come out. Gamespot, IGN, and EGM all contradict the release of this game for the Cube; but Epinions, EB games, and of course, Amazon all show that the release of this game is indeed quite realistic. I can't wait to play the game of the year on my console for even more fun gameplay. It would certainly be heartbreaking if the game failed to come out. *fingers crossed*

Ghost Glitch

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 1 / 11
Date: May 26, 2004
Author: Amazon User

Needless to say I wont ever purchase another Clancy or Uni Soft game. I found the movements in Ghost Recon to be slow and clumsy and about every fourth play the game will freeze up entirely. The combat is unrealistic and the weapon systems wholly inaccurate. Very disappointing, but we live and learn. Peace.

Flawed but Fun

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 0 / 1
Date: June 01, 2003
Author: Amazon User

For a game released in 2003, the graphics are mediocre. Especially the people: at a distance, they are grainy blobs. Up close, they're blocky and awkward looking. The Gamecube is capable of much more, and deserves better work from Ubi Soft. And the AI is really as bad as people have said.

But despite those problems, Ghost Recon is still a fun game. It's different from Medal of Honor, where you're on your own for most levels. In Ghost Recon, it really is about the squad, and using a variety of resources to complete a mission. You can select different soldiers for different missions, give them different weapons etc.

Ghost Recon is not a great game, but realistic FPS's are hard to come-by for the Gamecube, and you could do worse.

Horrible

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 0 / 3
Date: December 13, 2003
Author: Amazon User

I rented this game for two weeks, and I can tell you that it was really, really bad. The interface was really screwed up, with confusing, unorthodox controls. The zoom and aiming was confusing, and once you were trying to aim, it took a while to detoggle it.
The weapons were monotonous. There was no diversity between them and they all did essentially the same thing.
The graphics were moderate, but still disappointing and sub gamecube quality.
Personally, I think that even Terminator 2 for the SNES was better than this game (in relation to its time, of course). And Terminator 2 was a bad game.


Review Page: 1 2 3 Next 



Actions