User Reviews (1 - 11 of 24)

Show these reviews first:

Highest Rated
Lowest Rated Newest
Oldest Most Helpful
Least Helpful

Such an incredible disappointment. BG in name only.

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 14 / 25
Date: November 09, 2004
Author: Amazon User

(...) I have gotten hours of enjoyment from Baldur's Gate & Baldur's Gate II for the PC. This game bears no resemblence to them whatsoever. It is purely hack-n-slash. The case claimed "Three customizeable characters." I have no idea what they meant by that. You can be a Human archer, Dwarf fighter, or Human (female) mage. I don't know if stats were pre-programmed or rolled, and I don't care. You can't even pick their names or the color of their clothes. The closest they come to "customizeable" is that when you advance a level you can distribute points to different skills and every fourth level you can add a point to an attribute. But by the time the game is (quickly) over, you should have just about every skill at almost 100% and about 3 points added to different attributes.
This game reminded me of "Diablo" (the first Diablo, the crappy one), without the imagination or "Adventure" for the Atari 2600, with better graphics. It features complete linear progression with no side quests (there are three or four assignments that resemble side quests but are fulfilled entirely in the course of the main quest) and only ten or so NPCs that you can talk to (most of which are in the room where the game begins), three of whom are the people in each area (the whopping THREE areas) from whom you buy and sell stuff. It features a very small city with streets surrounded by buildings you can't enter and filled with people you can't talk to. Anyone who thinks this game resembles D&D at all (asside from the rules, perhaps) must have had a bowl of Jello for a DM (really unimaginative Jello). I could have come up with a more interesting game of D&D rolling my own wandering monsters with a page of blank graph-paper.
I kept playing only because I hoped that it would get better somewhere, it didn't. The last boss was easier than the previous three and the battle with her was over so quickly (hack-heal-hack-heal-hack-slash-slash) that I figured that it was simply an intro into a real battle that I hoped would be the intro into the real game. I was wrong. The game end is a cutscene which at first you hope is going to tell you about the real game awating you but turns out to be foreshadowing of another GameCube Baldur's Gate game. Baldur's Gate for the GameCube came out in 2002 and Baldur's Gate II for the GameCube doesn't yet exist, that should tell you something about the appeal of this game.
If you like hack & slash games, you still shouldn't get this. Black Isle should be ashamed of themselves for putting their name on this product and lowering the quality of an otherwise wonderful Baldur's Gate series.

normal people beware

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 2 / 42
Date: August 15, 2005
Author: Amazon User

I played this game once and it was realy bad and nerdy. this is a game that nerds (the ugly kind with long leater coats and plactic jewels that call themsleves lords of daeath an stuff.) play when they arent playing dungeons and dragons. amazon save these young kids life and post my review,

Not too good...

2 Rating: 2, Useful: 1 / 3
Date: May 02, 2006
Author: Amazon User

If you like wimpy over-head view games you'll like this one. The characters are so small they are almost undistinguishable from each other. The worlds are hard to find your way through. Unless you have a walkthrough it would be nearly impossible to find your way through this game. And even then it's still almost impossible not to get lost. I quit after only a few sessions. Because the fun level is almost zero. You can play with a friend. And then both of you can get lost and not have fun.

Baldur's Gate Coulda Been a Contender...

3 Rating: 3, Useful: 17 / 17
Date: January 15, 2006
Author: Amazon User

Baldur's Gate Dark Alliance is basically a version of Diablo with a Dungeon & Dragons makeover. While it implements only a small subset of the D&D rules, there are many game elements -- feats, creatures, weapons, attribute buy-up, etc -- that would be very familiar to someone familiar with the D&D rules. All of those rules are implemented in a 3rd-person-from-above-perspective, graphical interface which Diablo seemed to invent, but which is often copied in RPG style games. In my opinion, this is not a negative -- that interface formula has proven to work well for this style of game, and there's no reason to invent an inferior wheel to avoid being labeled a Diablo clone.

Here are the positives of this game:
- Unlike most RPGs that claim to be multiplayer, this game actually allows a second player to participate in the adventure in the main game mode to the same degree as the first player. Usually, "multiplayer" turns out to be some limited, deathmatch mode thrown into the game as an afterthought.
- The water and shadow graphic effects are outstanding. Clearly, the developers thought this as well since you need to wade through water in half the scenes. The way the water ripples, and how the waves propagate and reflect is really quite a nice piece of eye candy.
- You can 'import' a character into the game you're playing, even if it was saved while playing another mission. This ability to develop and then keep your character for other adventures is a great feature. If only there were other, harder editions of Baldur's Gate to reuse my characters, I'd call this the crowning achievement of the game.

But here are the game's negatives:
- The game is very short. At 'normal' difficulty, I'd estimate I only had 10 hours of play time into the game when I suddenly found that I'd defeated the entire game. And that was at a conservative pace... less patient players might finish the entire game in a single sitting.
- There is not much variety in the three character types. Even though you may choose to be a warrior, an archer, or a mage, towards the end, all three are best served by using the very powerful melee weapons that become available along the way. The mage, in particular, does not receive comparable upgrades, and the bows also fell short of their melee counterparts. Baldur's Gate should have implemented D&D-like character creation to create better differentiation between characters. Seems like it would have been easy to do.
- The box sets an expectation that D&D rules are implemented, but they are very loosely and inconsistently applied. There are certainly recognizable D&D elements, but I suspect that hard core D&D fans will be disappointed. It would have been nice if the various creature types had been identified by a label (even though I think I know what most of them were).
- The replies to computer characters ("NPCs") don't seem to affect the story progression in any way. There is really only a single story line to follow, and either you find all the requested items, or you don't. Whether you find everything or not, you can still finish the game. It seems to me that one of the basic premises of D&D is that there can be consequences to your actions, but that is not the case here.

Nevertheless, my son and I had a lot of fun playing this game up until its premature, abrupt end. Had some of the basic negatives been fixed, and if the storyline had been expanded to make the game last for a month of play, this could have been one of the all-time best Gamecube titles. It leaves me wondering which is the bigger crime: 1) the total absence of greatness; or 2) wasted, unfulfilled potential? In the case of #1, I just feel like I wasted some money. In the case of #2 and Baldur's Gate, I think I feel even more disappointed than a mere dent in my wallet. Sigh... Baldur's Gate, you coulda been a contender, but in the end, you turned out to be a bum.

A disappointment to its series.

3 Rating: 3, Useful: 9 / 13
Date: August 11, 2003
Author: Amazon User

I have greatly enjoyed all previous games I've played in the Baldur's Gate series for the PC, and I expected more greatness from this, only to be severely let down. Oh, it's a decent game, sure, worth renting or borrowing to see if you like it. However, I can't help but feel that it would have benefited from another year or two in development.
For one thing, the game is too darn short! Only three chapters, culminating in a sort of half-climax - it tries to be gripping and dramatic, but it's not. This combined with a total lack of respawning foes means that, in order to "max out" your characters' capabilities, you must play it over and over and over unless you've got a good bit of space on your memory card and are willing to simply play the same area over and over and over.
Secondly, the plot is quite poor. The villain's history is sort of interesting, but they simply leave too much unsaid - exactly what went on that she could not only return from but conquer Death? Are all of the enemies you meet beforehand simply her flunkies? What's the Dragon doing? Your character is given just a teensy bit of backstory, not enough to go on, and the slight differences in NPC response don't really help much.
Third, the graphics. Now, I'm playing on the Gamecube, and the graphics are very well polished, lighting and water effects are great, but in order to be outstanding they needed a few more tweaks. The camera is zoomed just a bit too far out, the Dragon's wings are a bit too small and his legs too stumpy (if he's a juvenile, somebody say it, please!) and everything slows down after I lay four or five Fire Shields. I understand why it does that, but isn't there a hardware addition of some sort to help compensate for it?
And why, might I ask, does the Drow sorceress start to pole-dance her staff? You can't animate that kind of thing on accident, you know.

In short, Baldur's Gate: Dark Alliance was a major disappointment for me as a BG fan. I can only hope that the sequel is better.
Nice try, Black Isle - but try again.

fun but short

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 7 / 8
Date: January 10, 2003
Author: Amazon User

Baulders Gate Dark Alliance is a very fun game but the story lacking. The Graphics were good and the music was alright. The Only problem with this game is that it is very short and not very challenging (on normal mode). If they made the game longer it would probably be one of the best if not the best game for the Game Cube.

Fun Classic D&D Game

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 5 / 6
Date: January 06, 2004
Author: Amazon User

This is a fun game that brings a lot of the features of classic D&D role playing to the GameCube. It reminds me a lot of classic computer games like Larn with different races and character abilities, experience points, health, and Mana for spells.

I enjoy playing a lot. Your character goes off on quests and meets increasingly difficult foes along the way. It is very addictive and I can play for hours.

The only things that keep this from being a 5-star, can't miss game are the graphics - which have you zoomed out so far you can barely see both the main character and the foes - and the very PC-like look and feel. It doesn't take very good advantage of the GameCube's advanced graphics capability and looks not very different than PC games I played 15 years ago on my 386 with EGA. The very limited attacks - just A button attack, B button cast spell - pale in comparison to even the average Nintendo-64 game.

I would also appreciate a way to tell what kind of monster I am fighting - Giant? Troll? Golem? Who knows? It would add to the story for old D&D-ers.

But with those shortcomings, I do recommend this game and hope they come out with additional GameCube games in the series. When and if they do, I'll be buying. Dark Alliance is faithful in adhering to the D&D genre.

Must own game, but if you have a PS2 or XBox...

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 4 / 5
Date: May 01, 2003
Author: Amazon User

This is a fantastic game if you get any enjoyment out of dungeon crawl games, such as Diablo and Dungeon Siege. The fact that two players can play simultaneously through the campaign alone would make it worth buying, and the fantastic graphics, solid gameplay, and ability to customize your character through skills and feats make this game a must own. However, the Game Cube version is arguably the weakest version of this game, which has also been ported to the XBox and PS2. The frame rates, which are constantly maxed out on the other consoles, regularly dip into the jerky range. However, if you only own a GameCube, this is well worth it.

Baldur's Gate: Dark Alliance

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 1 / 5
Date: July 15, 2003
Author: Amazon User

I am a very big gamer. Therefor I have payed quite a few games. I have to say this is one of my favorites. If you like the dungeons and dragons type stuff I would recommend this game to anyone of any age. I know the rating is teen. However my little brothers are only 9 and they're on it a lot. I would give this game a 10/10.

Great Game BUT Too Short

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 1 / 3
Date: December 03, 2003
Author: Amazon User

It's a great game and worth buying at this price for sure! Was disapointed though when I finished the game. The cliff hanger (won't spoil it for you) left me expecting a part 2 was on the way. Last I saw the next episode was only for Xbox or something. LAME! Still, I have to say it was great while it lasted and the were 3 characters to play it through with. Wish it would have been more like DiabloII.

Review Page: 1 2 3 Next 

Actions