Below are user reviews of Conflict: Denied Ops and on the right are links to professionally written reviews.
The summary of review scores shows the distribution of scores given by the professional reviewers for Conflict: Denied Ops.
Column height indicates the number of reviews with a score within the range shown at the bottom of the column.
Higher scores (columns further towards the right) are better.
Summary of Review Scores |
| | | | | | | | | |
0's | 10's | 20's | 30's | 40's | 50's | 60's | 70's | 80's | 90's |
User Reviews (1 - 11 of 11)
Show these reviews first:
Deny I played it..
1
Rating: 1,
Useful: 6 / 11
Date: February 17, 2008
Author: Amazon User
This is the second time I reviewed this game, let's see if it shows up THIS time. Right to the point, I despised this game, 3 out of 5 on grahics, (it's more in league with a poorly done PS2 game) and nothing new in the action department. It says on the box that You can destroy just about anything in the environment, NOT true. It's the same standard shoot the exploding barrel, gas can, propane tank, nothing You have'nt seen in every other FPS a thousand times. The voice acting is HORRIBLE and zombie-like, "go-over-there". The only time conversation starts sounding a little better is when the black character keeps screaming "Redneck" at everyone, "You on My extermination list redneck", "I can't go over there redneck", "who're those rednecks We just smoked", "I aint gonna let You die rednek", etc, etc... Maybe He could've just screamed "honkey" every now and then instead?
DO NOT BUY
1
Rating: 1,
Useful: 3 / 3
Date: March 04, 2008
Author: Amazon User
This new Conflict game is nothing like the old conflict series. First of all, it's in first person (which I expected from the previews), but is just bland. I barely played the first level and I don't know if you get more weapons like the old series. The graphics stink and doesn't utiliize the power of the PS3. I have know idea why Eidos took a successful storyline and functional control layout to create this waste of money. My buddy and I loved all four of the previous series and we were sadly disappointed with Denied Ops. I bought one as a birthday gift and one for myself and returned both. I hope a new Conflict game is created going back to the old format with new graphics and new weaponry. Save your moola for Vegas 2.
Not Worth Your $$$
1
Rating: 1,
Useful: 0 / 0
Date: February 28, 2008
Author: Amazon User
I was really excited about this game but it was nothing but a let down. The graphics look like something I'd get on a PS2 and the missions are not interesting. The dialog is just dumb. The controls, in my opinion, could have been much better. The "completely destructable envirnment" I have yet to find. ALL the movements are slow, firing is slow (about 1 shot per second with the M16), switching between weapons is slower than that. You can't use malee while you are reloading, you have to wait until your done. To sum it up... DON'T BUY IT!!!
JDP
1
Rating: 1,
Useful: 0 / 0
Date: March 14, 2008
Author: Amazon User
This Game was not at all what they said it would be. I was and still , very upset that I wasted my money, there should be some kind of QA for this sort of thing. These games are so expensive now. I will do better research next time before I throw my money down the toilet, which by the way would have been a better investment. The bad language would have been tolerated if the graphics and game play were at least up to par, if they knew about this garbage they should have pushed it back until they got it right "BOOOOOOOOOOOO........
Disastrous!!!
1
Rating: 1,
Useful: 0 / 0
Date: March 16, 2008
Author: Amazon User
How should I describe this game? It's a making-fools-out-of-players game!!!
1)I thought I was playing zombies shooting game, it was worse, it's more easy to kill a zombie than any of your enemy, why? they die so hard!
even you can aim right at them sucessfully in red circles, it takes you at least 7~8 shots for a rifle or sniper, over 20, or sometimes over 30 shots from a machine-gun, to gun down only 1 enemy, so don't be glad whenever even you are fully loaded with bullets.
What piss me is when your enemies are right in front of you or only 1~2 meters away! you raise your fires, they can easily dodge my fires and run away to hide like ghost.
And sometimes they are coming out to shoot you or hit you down right from nowhere after you have turned 360 degrees 2~3 times to have assured no one is around. even you are alerted and ready to hit back, they will become jumpers, jumping to in front you unbelievably quick and you are down already.
2) Beware of ricochets! don't think you are save even you are sure you are 100% covering yourself, as you are still getting hit without knowing why, ricochets are the only answer I can think of, otherwise...
3)Graphics are bad, you can only see gunfires but you can never can where they shot from, the graphics of enemies are too tiny to spot even when you are using sniper scope-mode, still your enemies are able to shoot you down from miles away even you are shielding yourself well.
4)Sometimes missions fail but you are not shot at all, I thought the enemies were using chemical weapons, poison-gas or so, otherwise no explanation too...
5)it takes too long to heal your partner, slow injections and your partner gets up too slow.
6)the game cannot be saved if you are playing missions by co-ops, unless you play until the missions are completed, otherwise you have to start from the very beginning.
7)when you are using night-vision scope, the green light is very dim and keeps flickering, your eyes feel very uncomfortable.
8)Too few missions too, We feel ripped of money!!!
I don't mind simple shooting games with nothing new, but don't trick or treat the players unwisely.
I wonder if the game is tested seriously before it was put out in the market.
I had no choice because it has split-screen play-mode as off-line split-screen games are getting less and less in the market, but I still regret to have purchased this one, my friend and I are so pissed and really wanted to throw it away.
Waist of money!!!
Save your money
2
Rating: 2,
Useful: 4 / 6
Date: February 23, 2008
Author: Amazon User
If you haven't bought it, don't. If I could return it, i would have in the first 5 minutes. Graphics - so, so. Storyline - lame. Dialogue - terrible. Missions - simple. Overall it's a poor return for $60. Unless you've gone through everything on the PS3 list and are really, really bored, spend your money on something more rewarding.
Disappointing...
2
Rating: 2,
Useful: 0 / 0
Date: March 08, 2008
Author: Amazon User
This game just didn't have the production values of other shooter games on the ps3 such as cod4, rs:v, and resistence. Too bad because I was looking for another coop shooter. My recommendation is to wait for army of two and rainbow six vegas 2 if you want a real coop shooter.
Not Bad
3
Rating: 3,
Useful: 1 / 1
Date: February 26, 2008
Author: Amazon User
Not bad for a shooting game but not as expected and as previews. Standard game missions. There is no change of shooting game concept. Game sounds and graphics are not bad. Easy to handle and play. I had a different expectation as per previews. In short, good game and fun to play. I would give it 3.5 to 4.
Decent shooter game
4
Rating: 4,
Useful: 2 / 7
Date: February 17, 2008
Author: Amazon User
Decent first person shooter game. Excellent graphics and good campaign mode. I had a lot of fun playing this game and was pretty hooked on it.
Fun game for 2 people play together
4
Rating: 4,
Useful: 0 / 0
Date: February 27, 2008
Author: Amazon User
I downloaded the demo and played it with my boyfriend, and we think it's fun so we decide to buy it. The graphic is average good, not best though, the control is easy to handle and not too difficult to play. Overall an average good game, nice split screen co-op mode, it's fun to play with someone else together.
Review Page:
1 2 Next
Actions