Below are user reviews of Fighting Force 2 and on the right are links to professionally written reviews.
The summary of review scores shows the distribution of scores given by the professional reviewers for Fighting Force 2.
Column height indicates the number of reviews with a score within the range shown at the bottom of the column.
Higher scores (columns further towards the right) are better.
Summary of Review Scores |
| | | | | | | | | |
0's | 10's | 20's | 30's | 40's | 50's | 60's | 70's | 80's | 90's |
User Reviews (1 - 11 of 23)
Show these reviews first:
Total opposite of first Fighting Force! Goldeneye for SEGA
5
Rating: 5,
Useful: 36 / 44
Date: December 02, 1999
Author: Amazon User
It plays just like Goldeneye 007! It sports amazing graphics and runs smooth at 60 fps with no popup even with all the action. It is very unlike the 1st side scrolling Fighting Force, it plays a lot like Metal Gear Solid because sometimes you have to sneak instead of straight on kill everybody in sight. It has multiplayer but I have not played it. Bottom Line: amazing game, good graphics, lots of action, cool weapons (awesome sniper), amazing frame rate, and multiplayer! Fans of Goldeneye and Metal Gear check it out!
Fighting force II
1
Rating: 1,
Useful: 16 / 20
Date: December 25, 1999
Author: Amazon User
Wow, what an immense dissapointment this game turned out to be. The good folks at Eidos are responsible for some outstanding games--the brilliant "Tomb Raider" being among their finest. They really dropped the ball this time. Fighting Force II is a complete waste of time and money--this isn't even worth the price of a rental--not even if you have a coupon for a free rental! Let me summarize briefly: sloppy control, lackluster graphics, moronic artificial intelligence, boring level design, mediocre sound, and to top it off, it just isn't any fun beside all these problems. I have enormous patience with video games; sometimes one has to delve deeply into a game to appreciate its finer points. As far as I'm concerned, this game has no finer points. Not only is a poor game, it's got its share of bugs too. This is a good example of a company rushing a product to the X-mas market when it should have seen quite a bit more development time. STAY AWAY FROM THIS ONE
B-
4
Rating: 4,
Useful: 0 / 2
Date: January 01, 2000
Author: Amazon User
the graphics are ok and the story is cool the first one is better but i would buy it cuz it's pretty cool
at least rent it
50 bucks?
1
Rating: 1,
Useful: 0 / 0
Date: January 01, 2000
Author: Amazon User
Plain and simple, I just got it and I don't want it, I don't Know what game the 5 star player from california has played because there is no multiplayer mode and I'd like to know what that persons playing because I went by that review and the assumption it was simaler to Fighting Force for play station.The one star gamer from PA pretty much sum it up well.
Fighting Force 2
1
Rating: 1,
Useful: 0 / 0
Date: January 05, 2000
Author: Amazon User
This game is terrible. It is full of bugs, the sound is awful, and the controls aren't any better. Wait for a better game like Code Veronica, or Shenmue. Don't waste your money with this, trust me, I DID!
Fighting Force 2? A major suprise and disappointment
3
Rating: 3,
Useful: 3 / 4
Date: January 08, 2000
Author: Amazon User
With horrible sound, annoying movement and control, this game puts Eidos and Core to shame. Like we havent already seen enough crappy games such as every single "Tomb Raider". The suprise to me was how different it was from the first one. I respect its way of a different kind of gameplay that only a few games use such as "Syphon Filter" and "Metal Gear Solid". Not to mention the graphics are terrible and certainly did not take full advantage of the systems capabilities. If you've seen the previews for games "Shenmue" or " R.E. Code Veronica", those are examples of superb graphics. The levels in the game are just long, not because they are hard, just because they're really...really.....long and boring. The challenge isnt really there but if you're looking for a quick, fun, game to play, by the end of the weekend you'll be happy you hadnt bought it. Save your money, there will be bigger and better dreamcast games to come.
Sick game!
1
Rating: 1,
Useful: 1 / 4
Date: January 08, 2000
Author: Amazon User
If I could give this game negative score , I would do it.First of all , It is action game , it should be have some fast action,but this game's just slow .The graphic is just a little bit better than PSX version. For the control is sick(angle problem).I played this game in 10 min ,it make me dizzy.OK ,If you'll buy this game , make sure you have extra money for medicine.
FUN and GUNS!
5
Rating: 5,
Useful: 3 / 4
Date: January 11, 2000
Author: Amazon User
This game is great! I don't know what some of the other reviews on here a talking about! It's a Fighting game with LOTS of weapons and tonnes of levels (which I'm having trouble getting through!). The last thing I would call this game is bad. Admittedly it's got very little story bit WHO CARES it's a GAME! FF2 uses a lot things taken from other (great) titles (Fighting Force I/MGS/Syphon Filter), but it's kind of a mixture of what I like the best in all of them! Lots of locations/a little adventure/simple puzzles but most of all.... Lots of fighting and what with! Bats, pipes, pistols, Uzis, Assault rifles, a REALLY cool Rocket launcher, grenades, flame throwers..... It's so cool blowing the hell out of a stack of oil drums and watching the enemies reaction! I could go on but I'm getting off here to gun some more bad guys!
"he'll never give up, he'll stay till the fights won.."
3
Rating: 3,
Useful: 1 / 1
Date: January 12, 2000
Author: Amazon User
ok, despite the negative reviews, for this lackluster sequel. ff2 is your basic mediocre game at best. but it does has it's moments.
in ff2, you play the main charcter from the first game (HAWK) who romps and stomps his way through many terrorist bases and so forth, the premise is more like a poor man's syphon filter, with much better graphics, which do not do the DC any justice. crummy punch & kick moves, no solid storyline like METAL GEAR or SYPHON FILTER. and even worse. not enough save points, u could play over an hour in just one level. and if u get killed more than twice; "GAME OVER MAN" )0=
NOW WHAT I DO LIKE; is the character designs (that looks like it came straight out of a G.I.JOE cartoon, hey it's no coincidence why he's called HAWK.) The weapons are cool especially the POWER GLOVE and the first person sniper mode plays an important part in stragety.
with that said, i can only recommend ff2, for fans of this kinda genre. otherwise wait for the upcoming hits like zombie revenge or carrier. ff2 is like junk food, u know it's bad for you, but you cant throw it away, at least till you finish half of it.
Fighting Force 2 puts the ucks in sucks
2
Rating: 2,
Useful: 2 / 2
Date: January 18, 2000
Author: Amazon User
FF2 really bites, the sound is awful. Not to menchin thehorrible graphics I mean the only reason people bought the Dreamcastwas for better graphics, Fighting Force puts the Dreamcast to shame.FF2's graphics are just a little bit better than psx's ff.Spend your money on something else, anything besides Fighting Force2.
Review Page:
1 2 3 Next
Actions