User Reviews (1 - 11 of 20)

Show these reviews first:

Highest Rated
Lowest Rated Newest
Oldest Most Helpful
Least Helpful

what is the crying?

5 Rating: 5, Useful: 3 / 4
Date: December 02, 2003
Author: Amazon User

I am not a fan of warhammer, but I cannot see too much flaws in this game...the textures are very well done(considering the ps2 capabilities), the controls...I did read someone saying that he cannot get acostumed to the control scheme, but this game uses the same control configuration as Red faction, medal of honor and other shooters in the ps2, you must have total control on both analog joysticks to master the movements...this is nothing new, maybe this guy "is new" to fps in ps2-.

The only drawback that I found in this game is the online capabilities and the multiplayer that are very lacking compared to other games, the single player experience is excellent. Maybe it is no HALO(Xbox) but man...if you want something like that on the ps2...you'll have to wait...maybe until ps3. If you dont want to wait then...just buy an xbox and play your so blessed HALO.

Pretty cool!

5 Rating: 5, Useful: 3 / 10
Date: December 26, 2004
Author: Amazon User

I love Warhammer and have been collecting an army for 4 years, so when this came out I knew I had to buy it. The combat is pretty cool, and there is a lot of shooting and grenade throwing. I have to admit the AI isn't all that smart, but they make up for it with LOTS of soldiers. You have a few allies sometimes, but they usually die within a few minutes and I always like having a few guys tag along with me. The graphics are kind of blotchy, something you would expect from a playstation 1 or an N64. I think if Americans had made this they could have made it a good bit better. It's still a good game and I would recomend it to anyone who wants a fun, cheap FPS.

Hope for the PS2

5 Rating: 5, Useful: 6 / 7
Date: January 21, 2004
Author: Amazon User

First of all, ignore every other review you read here at venerable ol' Amazon.com

Even if they had a good point, it was lost by the use of 8 year old grammar.

THIS game may be the saving FPS for PS2, and while not getting the commercial support, from a technical standpoint may be the only thing Sony has against the Halo Juggernaught. With so many once loyal MoH fans turning their backs on Rising Sun (im not sure why) PS2 needs a hit. FPS are entering a new era, spearheaded by Halo and hopefully DOOM3, unfortunately, both are for XBox (fine for me, ive got both ps2 and the x)leaving PS2 a tad High And Dry.

Enter Games Workshop and their remarkably gritty British gaming world of Warhammer 40,000. While merry ol' England may not at first seem to be the source for grit, as compared to our own oliver stone and quentin tarantino culture, their form of grit is one born of apathy. Look at so many examples of their darker exploits, like Judge Dredd and Death's Head. Very Dark properties indeed.

So how does WH40K jump onto that bandwagon? By dooming us all. In the FAR FAR future (40,000 is the YEAR) we are a species consumed with warfare. An archaic symbol of a once proud Emperor now sits immortally on his Golden Throne, kept alive through unnatural technical means, while mankind breeds enormous super soldiers capable of spitting acid, crushing a mans skull with a few fingers, and wear huge explosion proof armour suits. Vicious Aliens, including Eldar (think space elves, but more violent) Orks (think orcs, and...well, yeah...orcs.) and Tau (think techno-samurai) amongst many others which come and go (necrons=terminators, etc)
not to mention the thousands of Space Marines who joined the daemonic forces of chaos and were changed by the hell spawned powers of the Warp, returning these Chaos Marines to murder and plague that which they once loved.

Pretty dark eh?

well this is the world this game takes place in. a thriving gaming community has kept Games Workshop in business for a couple of decades now, despite costing around $5 per miniature (and a typical army would be about 30 soldiers or so, to begin)
I myself run 3 armies (Sisters of Battle, Chaos Marines of Khorne, and The Dark Angels) and yet this game far supercedes any expectation i could have had.

instead of you being the space marine, noble and gallant (think Sega Saturns' Space Hulk) you are a young Tau, whose people have been attacked and kidnapped by self righteous human space marines.
Now.
Take THAT storyline concept, give it the same gameplay mechanics as Halo, and the scripted event on the fly concept that MoH: Frontline gave us, and youve got Fire Warrior.

thats quite a buildup, so ill throw in the bad and ugly...

Its ONLY on PS2. but like i said, ps2 deserves its fair share of fps too.

Enemy graphics get a little stale. Yes we all know the xbox can out perform the ps2 any day, but still, for the first few missions the humans look identical, only 3 colored suits!

Look response is a tad slow. this is mainly a design flaw in the ps2 compared to the analog controllers on the xbox remote.

auto-save
i hate auto-save, because i invariably die just before i hit the next one and will have to re run the entire mission.

but dont let those stop you. this game is excellent, and makes good use of every inch the ps2 can give.

Gimme a Break!

5 Rating: 5, Useful: 6 / 6
Date: December 03, 2003
Author: Amazon User

THIS GAME ROCKS!!! (pun)

Of course a lot of gamers belch out that one for the lamest games around. But in this case I find it to be right on the money.

First let me say that I hate DARK games..Let me see doggone it! And Warhammer 40K is about the darkest game I've come across, It still rocks. Thank the gods for the nightvision option, I do wish it lasted a little longer.

I love the original 40K book/board game, but putting that aside, this game still rocks. The 40K theme is just an added bonus. It did take me by surprise that I would be fighting against the Imperium though, but what the hay Space Marines have to die too.

As far as the controls, like the above/below review mentioned, it's just like 4 or 5 other games. Left view, right move, it even lets you set the movement/sight ratio to let your controller's sensitivity move you along faster or slower. L1 fire, SQ change weapons, I had it down after the first level. Which you have to or you DIE, over and over.

Graphics are great, yes it is a little dark, but when you can see I find the scenery more than adequate, if you HAVE the time to look around. Because, this is a very fast pace game, if you stand in one spot for more than a minute you'll be attacked.

Weapons, weapons, who's got the weapons? I/you are always on the look out for the biggest and badest guns. Some shoot fast but aren't powerful, some are powerful but don't hold many bullets or refills are hard to come by. I found it best to have a Tau weapon for power and carry an enemy gun so I can have plenty of refills, seeing how you can grab reloads from the fallen. The occasional melda-guns are really powerful, but you can rarely fill one up with ammo. They are placed close to strong enemy though, so I usually grab one use it up then drop it for the one I had before. Note, take notice if you only have one or two rounds chambered in your weapon, there's nothing worse than jumping out into a crowd of angary space marines and having to reload.

Fire Warrior isn't just smash and grab. Although a lot of the main play is run threw, there are a few curve balls they throw at ya, from time to time, I think just to give you a little break between white knuckle battles. I had to sit and scratch my head a few times, wondering just where the heck to go.

And almost every level has a secondary O.P. that you may choose to pass up, but they're usually out of your way, run go figure this out and still make it out in time, "kinda things" that I didn't start getting until my second trip threw. You have to beat the game on normal mode before hard mode kicks in. (If you pause the missions are listed on the screen as well as the option to hear the last few radio broadcasts.)

The AI is as good as any of the latest PS2 games I've played Red Faction, TimeSplitter 2, although none of them will knock Halo off the top shelf. Yes, you do have the random "Stuck Feet" when you just happen to step in the perfect place, your just stuck in the mud, can't move, but what games don't have those. And yes some of the sergeants with grenades throw them at walls killing themselves, I say, thank goodness I don't have to kill that grenade totin' S.O.G.

The commodores and captains in the beginning are kinda hard to beat, considering the weapons you have to start with, but this just prepares you for the real fighting with the heavily armored Space Marines to come later in the game. Some of the Terminator/monsters in this game are just unbelievably tough, as they would be in "Real Life".

OK..so there's got to be a negative! Well, if I had to find fault with this game, I'd say it would be the lack of a backpack. Yes, you can carry a hand full of grenades and you do have a primary and secondary weapon, even a sword if you run outta ammo. But gimme a back pack, an extra health or 5 would help a good deal and we all like collecting odd trinkets threw our games. Medals, rare pistols, a flaming bayonet something out of the ordinary. But really health and a full clip of bullets is all a real Tau warrior needs anyway.

All this said, if you like first person shooters this one is a must have, if you like 40K this is a must have, if you like a game that can keep you on the edge of your seat for many many hours, this is the game for you.

But be prepared, When you hit the ground you better be running, and shooting and looking for ammo and health. Or you'll DIE DIE DIE!!!!

Oh yeah..Did I mention this game is DARK!

Great

5 Rating: 5, Useful: 1 / 1
Date: December 10, 2003
Author: Amazon User

I've played tau in the table top game.I would have to say it's quite realistic.I liked the game a lot and I think it could be one of the best games of the year.

THIS GAME ROCKS!!! (only second to HALO)

5 Rating: 5, Useful: 1 / 2
Date: December 23, 2003
Author: Amazon User

'ello fellow gamers. If your looking for a difficult, bloody, and not to mention extremely dark, this game is for you. Although the title says that it is second to HALO(Xbox) it kind of is the "HALO" for PS2. Unfortuanty (probably spelled it wrong) the only drawback is that the multiplayer is **** and controls take a while to get. I nailed them after the first mision. Quick to learn and so much better for me not to kill the Japanese in Medal of Honor, Rising Sun (I hate that game).

I thought that this is much less confusing then the board game. I love that game too and painting the models. It seems kinda creepy in the GW magazine how Kuju (maker of the game) said you should have a light on when you play this game. Well duh! It's not that scarey. And thank god you can use swords and you wont make people lose their heads literaly!

The weapons are really cool but some of them lack ammunition and some lack power. Those that lack power have lots o ammo and those with ammunition are pretty powerful or lose ammo fast but most of them reload pretty fast. The scenery is beyond cool (if you can see it of course) but the game moves so fast you don't to see much.

If the Sergeants get you mad in the begginning, then space marines will really anoy you!

ever since i played this game it is awesome

5 Rating: 5, Useful: 1 / 12
Date: August 21, 2005
Author: Amazon User

if i were to rate this i would give it 100 stars

Not bad

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 4 / 5
Date: February 09, 2004
Author: Amazon User

Fire Warrior isn't the best FPS on PS2, but it surely isn't the worst. However, don't expect it to be the HALO for PS2. First off, FW has a decent load of gameplay in it for a shooter. Some shooters i've played are incredible...then they end in 2 or 3 hours. You can expect to get 9+ hours on the story mode. And for all you lucky boys and girls with broadband, the online function will keep you entertained for a while as well. The graphics, while not mind-blowing, aren't too bad either. The sound is also very clear and crisp. One thing I actually liked in this game was that it was quite difficult. Even on easy mode you'll be in for a good challenge. So in the end, if your looking for an all-around FPS, this is a good buy.

Could have been a real challange to HALO

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 3 / 4
Date: November 25, 2003
Author: Amazon User

The action and story in this game is intense and captures you from the first battle. The one down side to this game is that the graphics are just average at best. With such a great story and pulse pounding action I am disappointed with the lack of detail in the graphics. The graphics remind of DOOM or Duke Nukem, not what you expect in todays gaming world.
But with that said the story in this game is fun, new, and exciting. All of things I have been missing in first person PS2 games. With better graphics this game could have challanged HALO easily.

Wow... I'd rather play Pong.

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 1 / 8
Date: January 04, 2004
Author: Amazon User

This is simply the worst game I have ever played. PS1 graphics really bring it down. And the enemies, they're so stupid!! The seargeant with the chainsaw tap dances and does some ballet instead of just running over to you. The character models are worse than pac-man models. Extremely blocky enemies, they're like little midgets. Wow, humans sure look like total doofuses in the future. I hope they burn every single copy of this terrible game. And for those of you wo say this game could match Halo: get off of the Vodka.

I'm not really 12 either, I'm 15, I just don't feel like setting the email thing up.

Review Page: 1 2 Next 

Actions