Below are user reviews of Golfwits Pro 2.0 and on the right are links to professionally written reviews.
The summary of review scores shows the distribution of scores given by the professional reviewers for Golfwits Pro 2.0.
Column height indicates the number of reviews with a score within the range shown at the bottom of the column.
Higher scores (columns further towards the right) are better.
User Reviews (11 - 13 of 13)
Show these reviews first:
Fraud
1
Rating: 1,
Useful: 0 / 0
Date: November 02, 2006
Author: Amazon User
The product is not working. I sent numereous emails to support without success. The website loads whenever. DO NOT WASTE YOUR MONEY.
Used on Treo 650
Golfwits vs. Intelligolf
5
Rating: 5,
Useful: 0 / 0
Date: August 22, 2003
Author: Amazon User
In my opinion there are really only two golf tracking systems to consider buying - Golfwits or Intelligolf. A year ago, when I purchased Golfwits, I did a big search for all sorts of golf tracking systems (about 30 of them including non PDA ones) and these were the best two bar none. I found another one called the Golf StatDoctor, which was kinda cool, but without having the PDA interface, it just didn't compare. It provided decent statistics (and some that neither Golfwits or Intelligolf provided), but was also a little clumsy to use. In all, there were only a handful of decent ones. Intelligolf and Golfwits definitely stand out.
Comparisons...
Golfwits is easy to use. Contrary to other reviews I've read, I felt the interface was very intuitive except for maybe when you make mistakes or need to insert penalty strokes. I'm still not sure if I'm doing penalty strokes right, but it works the way I do it. Intelligolf is also easy to use.
Golfwits has fully configurable stats. You can define your own statistics to either compliment or replace the ones provided by Golfwits. There's a whole section on this and even a downloadable API for the functions used to perform the calculations. You can do just about anything based on the data gathered. It's pretty impressive really. This is why I suggest using things such as setting track clubs and making sure to include first putt distance - to get the most out of the program. Intelligolf does not have configurable stats (or at least it didn't when I reviewed it).
Intelligolf is a better (easier) multiplayer system. If you are tracking scores for more than one player, it can be information overload. Although there is no way to just put the scores in for the other players, you can simply enter putts for those players. It would be nice if they provided an option even further than simply not tracking clubs to allow simply entering strokes for some users. I think this is where Intelligolf has the edge - in multi-player entry. Granted the results are less impressive in Intelligolf, it's certainly easier for multi-player entry.
Golfwits yardages and putting distances are a little touchy on such a small screen. if you're hands are a little shaky you could have some problems. They'd have to be pretty shaky, though. Intelligolf has no visual components, so this is not an issue.
Golfwits average yardage statistics for clubs include miss hits and chip shots. The stats are configurable to include/exclude miss hits, but chip shots are another story. You may wish to use a special club (GW or other) whenever chipping so as to not affect your clubs stats. Intelligolf has both problems - it doesn't have a "Miss Hit" option.
Lack of courses. Golfwits has 7000+. Intelligolf has 18000+. This comparison is not fair because Intelligolf courses have no graphical information, so I'm sure people are submitting courses all the time for that application. A con for Golfwits. A pro for Intelligolf.
Golfwits has some good side games, but I've never used them. From my playing around with them, I'd say they are as good as Intelligolf or maybe better if you are willing to enter all the stats for each player, however, since Intelligolf has the edge on multi-player use, I'd say side games are probably more convenient in Intelligolf, but that's just me speculating. I have no real experience here.
Golfwits is better at capturing more statistics with fewer clicks - MIMO. If you use the extended features in Intelligolf, such as fairways hit, GIR, sand saves, etc, it negates the benefits over Golfwits and in my opinion takes more effort to put in all the things because you have to manually input all this data. Plus, you'd have to manually input distances, etc. Where Golfwits takes three clicks to put all this information in, Intelligolf would take four or more clicks plus the manual yardage inputs and it lacks the visual benefits of Golfwits.
There are many, many other things I could compare, but these are the ones that stand out in my mind as I write this review.
Summary...
If you are looking for an individual game tracking system that provides the best statistical output based on the information you enter, Golfwits is the best one. Though Intelligolf still provides good statistics (as good as Golfwits in some respects), the visual aids included with Golfwits and the ability to tailor the statistics to your own needs makes it the better choice.
If you don't care about statistics as much and just want to track your scores (and the scores of others), Intelligolf is probably the way to go because it allows you to enter just scores and also allows you to view all player's scores on one page easier.
Read my other reviews on "How It Works" and "Courses and Mapwits".
Serious Stats -- But Prepare for a Steep Learning Curve
4
Rating: 4,
Useful: 0 / 0
Date: July 05, 2003
Author: Amazon User
I bought this last year and I'm still a fan a year later. First off I should admit I'm a bit of a gadget freak, so the hole idea of an on-course management tool appealed. Raves go to the interface & the fact that I haven't found a course that I haven't able to download. Now imagine this... you're on the couse with a friend (a rival!)and you whip out your iPAQ, tap it a few times and say, loud enough for your competitor to hear: "Hmmm... it's 57 yards to carry the trap and 73 to the front edge of the green... got it!" Three cheers for techno-intimidation!! Rants: the interface is only as good as the person who input the course. It also can't show elevation, which is too bad... but understandable enough. Lastly the interface isn't exactly intuitive... but easy enough when you spend some time with it; WARNING: practice with the interface BEFORE you go to the golf course, or you'll look stupid. It's really worth watching the flash example on their website about 6 times in a row.. !) Rants: I agree with another reviewer who stated that you really can't keep track of more than 2 people... data entry becomes too cumbersome. I'm happy with it & sure you will be too it you're a golf addict and a tech head!!
Review Page:
1 2
Actions