User Reviews (11 - 14 of 14)

Show these reviews first:

Highest Rated
Lowest Rated Newest
Oldest Most Helpful
Least Helpful

BORING

2 Rating: 2, Useful: 1 / 7
Date: October 28, 2005
Author: Amazon User

I bought this game a couple of weeks ago in europe. if u liked GOD OF WAR, u probably won't like this game. why, u ask? because it is a step back, maybe two steps back, it's outdated-- the graghics, the game play , the story plot, voice acting--the game play is confusing, u can't see what you're doing, because you are swarmed by 15 to 20 enemies at a time, so u resort to button smashing. i read that SPARTAN TOTAL WARRIOR "pushed the power of the console", i don't believe that, the graphics alone says other wise. the graghics aren't to bad, (the enviroment/backround are good) its just that the character/people graghics remind me of a nintendo 64 game. voice acting is terrible, period. the plot/story feels to me to be a rehash of a number of games i played before. i haven't finnished the game yet,(it's like a movie i've seen 5 times, why would i watch it again?) but, i'll be brave and try.
As video games become more sophisticated, realism becomes a factor as well. who should take on 15 to 20 opponents at one time? this game might have been good, (perhaps a top contenter, maybe ground breaking) 7 to 10 years ago. if u r looking for a good hack and slash video game try SHADOW OF ROME, it is an excellent game. i got this game because i heard it was like ROME:TOTAL WAR, but there's nothing similar about these two except that they both were made by CREATIVE ASSEMBLY. i think i played this game before, SPARTAN TOTAL WARRIOR is new, but all to familar. for me, it felt like i was playing a nindendo 64 game. rent before u buy.
PS: coolguyalex is a middle schooler and doesn't know what she talking about. games should be compared with other games like GOD OF WAR, that's how games get better, play the game, u'll know what i mean

Bad game

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 0 / 9
Date: November 09, 2006
Author: Amazon User

I can respect the other opinions, but to me is one of the worst games I ever know for PS. The graphics are very bad, like 200 years before "God of War", just better than Atari 2600's "Pac Man" and "Defender". The images are rigid, unnatural and the game is repetitive and senseless.

They had a very good material: the spartans, but realized a game far away from what you can expect from the actual standars of video games.

Classic Hack-N-Slash

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 0 / 0
Date: June 24, 2007
Author: Amazon User

I totally forgot I had this game unitl I just came upon it browsing through PS2 games. Not that this game is bad, just the opposite really, but because I had bought this game when it first came out, beat it, and haven't played it since(only because my collection has grown alot).

There really isn't much to say about this game. The graphics are really good, voice work(from what I can remember) is good. There really isn't anything hard about this game at all. This is just your typical hack and slash with a little bit of magic thrown in. Now, don't go thinking this is like God of War or any thing like that that because as fun as this game is, it doesn't compare to GOW.

This game is great to sit and play and try to relieve stress(or maybe not). But still, my favorite slasher game is still Devil Kings, but hey, this one will do just as good.

Uhhh.....

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 0 / 0
Date: May 23, 2007
Author: Amazon User

For those who didn't like the game and complained about the poor graphics, maybe check the cover of the game you were actually playing and write a review for that one... Spartan was awesome!!! Graphics weren"t amazing, but I wouldn't even joke about them being close to Atari... give your head a shake!!! Buy this game if you want to battle a day away!!

Review Page: 1 2 

Actions