Below are user reviews of Joint Task Force and on the right are links to professionally written reviews.
The summary of review scores shows the distribution of scores given by the professional reviewers for Joint Task Force.
Column height indicates the number of reviews with a score within the range shown at the bottom of the column.
Higher scores (columns further towards the right) are better.
Summary of Review Scores |
| | | | | | | | | |
0's | 10's | 20's | 30's | 40's | 50's | 60's | 70's | 80's | 90's |
User Reviews (1 - 10 of 10)
Show these reviews first:
a must have for RTS game fan
4
Rating: 4,
Useful: 9 / 12
Date: September 28, 2006
Author: Amazon User
This is a must have game for RTS fans it has an amazing graphics and compared to other RTS game that you could finish by collecting as much resources and getting gazillion troops and doing a kamikazi attack, on this game those tactics won't cut it. you actually need to think here in where to position your men and vehicles and the JTF community is topnotch no snobs and screaming noob on your face they're helpfull and that goes to the developers aswell (they actually read the forum).
The only reason i gave the game 4 stars is there's a few thing that needs to be ironed out in the game and a few addition options needed but i suppose not every game is perfect.
anyway if you decide to get this game i'll see u online "Multiplayer"
(CMDR Tacoshell)
Slow but very interesting
4
Rating: 4,
Useful: 5 / 7
Date: September 28, 2006
Author: Amazon User
I bought this game a few days ago and so far, It's been really interesting. I am a huge fan of C&C games and this one is quite close but a bit more realistic. You actually run out of amo and you need to call in supplies which ads to the "excitment" of the game.
Go for it... It's a good game.
Ramy
Nice effects, horrible realism
3
Rating: 3,
Useful: 6 / 7
Date: October 07, 2006
Author: Amazon User
If you like nice graphics and cool effects - go for it. If you are looking for realism, well don't. Since when does an Abrams need three hits to crack a BMP? And since when does an Abrams tank shoot only as far as city block is long?
If you want the 'real thing' stick to the old 'Close Combat' series.
Horrible Horrible Game, worst $50 I ever spent!
1
Rating: 1,
Useful: 2 / 17
Date: October 07, 2006
Author: Amazon User
I just bought this game hoping for an excellent strategy game with great graphics. Well, is it a great strategy game? I don't know as on my PC (twice the system the game calls for) the game is SO slow as to be unplayable! It runs almost in reverse, that is how slow it is! I have it down to the lowest 'acceptable' resolution for me (1024 x 768) and it is impossible to control anybody or anything. My armies get their butts whupped as I am trying to move around, even SCROLLING is horrible!! I would not waste $5 on this game even in a bargain bin. I don't think this was even play-tested (maybe on $4000 alienware?) but do not waste your money on this. I should have waited but this one looked so good. Oh well, live and learn!
Nice Concept but Issues with Implementation
3
Rating: 3,
Useful: 4 / 5
Date: January 27, 2007
Author: Amazon User
Joint Task Force lets you control tanks, infantry, harriers in more in a variety of battlefield situations.
The graphics are reasonably good here. Trees get knocked over when you roll over them in your tank, snow falls down onto the dusted battlefield, flags flutter in the breeze. Clicking on a unit shows you circles around them indicating the range of the various weapons the unit holds. It makes strategizing your next move relatively easy.
You can zoom in and out with great ease, and either do map control on your own or set the camera to follow a group. You have a few formations your units can move in, and infantry can 'go prone' if there's no cover around. There are numerous vehicles lying around - military and civilian - that you can hop into and drive.
You can skirmish in random setups with factions, maps and units that you want to practice with, and you can do full campaigns where you take on pre-set objectives. There's also online gameplay if you want to take on other humans.
There are "heroes" in this game which inspire your troops and order in new weapons and items. Each also has special skills - for example a weapons hero might let you repair vehicles more readily. Reinforcements get dropped off via helicopter and you actually get to choose up to X units that "fit" in that helicopter.
On our system the units move quickly and smoothly - the problem lies with the lack of strategy needed - but the high level of micromanagement necessary. Normally you can just plow ahead at the enemy forces, but every unit needs continual reminders of what they are supposed to be doing. There isn't a lot of cover or other types of advantages on many maps, meaning it ends up being a mass-up-and-go assault.
You can capture flags (i.e. territory) which get you more cash, and airstrips to be able to drop heavier vehicles.
I do have to comment that the little infantry look rather silly when they get shot - they go flying what seems to be miles. They have some scale issues here.
The sound is reasonable enough - an epic sounding instrumental, voices that answer your commands. I'm not sure what more you'd really want from this type of strategy game. On cut scenes, voices often don't sync up with the people, though. During campaign play you sometimes get little 'news videos' of what is going on in your world.
You're not building up bases here, so your options are usually not defensive - instead, you're building your mobile attack force to wipe out your enemy. Units get experience as they go, but damage is 'realistic' so unless you're skilled you often get your units slaughtered before they have that opportunity.
I compare this most with the original Command & Conquer, without the base aspect. You could consider this therefore worse - or you could say it's a better version because of the improved graphics. Part of the problem is that even starting the first campaign on normal difficulty (choosing from normal or hard) you tend to get slaughtered quickly unless you've been playing these things for a while. Even experienced gamers will find even the starting missions challenging.
So a nice concept but with some reality issues and also a poor scaling of difficulty if they want this playable by the average gamer.
A bit slow, very crazy, uber fun
4
Rating: 4,
Useful: 2 / 2
Date: March 19, 2007
Author: Amazon User
This game was quite a good buy. Aside from stunning graphics, the gameplay is excellent, much more tactically oriented than many other games. And act5ion comes quite thick (escpecially in skirmish mode, where it may actually come a little TOO thick)
I reccoment it for any RTS fan, but if you aren't an RTS fan, maybe you should pass it up.
Definitely not your average RTS
5
Rating: 5,
Useful: 1 / 1
Date: July 14, 2007
Author: Amazon User
I LOVE This game.period. The gameplay is amazing, even if i comes with a pretty steep learning curve. The graphics are phenomenal. The story line is great, and the actual game dynamics and usable items etc are almost endless. GREAT GAME!!!!!!
Simple game
4
Rating: 4,
Useful: 1 / 1
Date: October 06, 2007
Author: Amazon User
I played this game for a few weeks for hours every other day. I found it was pretty simple to kill the enemy just by taking the airfield and defending it while gradually building up your forces between each wave of attacks by the enemy. It was fun to fight against 3 AI forces but it was easy just to defend the area you start out in while the other 3 forces took each other out,all the while you build up your tanks and call in strikes on the remaining forces repair trucks and missile trucks. I thought the graphics were pretty good but I'm not sure what the standard for RTS games is because i have only played a few. I didn't have any problems playing it offline but i was never able to actually play it online but i blame that on my internet provider since i have many problems with online games because of them. I would say for $20 this game is worth a try.
Save Your $
2
Rating: 2,
Useful: 0 / 1
Date: February 22, 2008
Author: Amazon User
Forget it folks, this is nothing more than a bad game with a lot of hyped up pictures on the box.
I love RTS games and would play them all day if it paid. But if you really enjoy RTS games this is a real disappointment. The best way I can describe it, IRRITATING! No resource management hardly, no base defense, and quite frankly most missions take 2-5 tries even on "EASY" I suppose part of me held this game to a C&C Generals type game but oh well, I played, I cried, I spent more than three dollars.
I returned it once and then just gave up.
1
Rating: 1,
Useful: 1 / 5
Date: February 29, 2008
Author: Amazon User
This was a gift for my grandson. When I learned that he couldn't install it on his three year old PC, I tried on my 3 GHz PC with 2 GB of RAM and kept getting a CD error. Amazon was great about returning it and the replacement installed, although installing the four CDs took about thirty minutes, but then both my grandson and I got the same message when we tried to run it, that we couldn't use it because the graphics card does not support Pixel Shaders or or Vertex Shaders, which I had to look up. A text file on one CD gave a list of supported graphics cards, and it was the same list as another game I had given him from another company and he had successfully installed. Then I gave up. $80 or more for a graphics card that might or might not work, and all this over a $20 game, was just too much. Maybe Amazon would take it back again, but between running it back and forth between our two houses all of this has already taken three months, and enough is enough. I tried to give it no stars, but the system wouldn't accept that.
Review Page:
1
Actions