User Reviews (1 - 11 of 79)

Show these reviews first:

Highest Rated
Lowest Rated Newest
Oldest Most Helpful
Least Helpful

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooo!

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 1 / 35
Date: December 08, 2004
Author: Amazon User

I don't want Spark they made MOH series for the consoles! I Want Gray Matter or Infinity Ward Come on the ones for the computer were so much better! Multiplayer ROX on the computer! But sadly the one 4 ps2 doesnt even have co op u have to have broadband, which mine doesnt even work, or dial up adapter. I Definetely think they could do better at the first sniper level i gave up it was so hard.

Pretty Cool, just the graphics(are not very pleasing).

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 0 / 1
Date: November 21, 2006
Author: Amazon User

The gamplay is great, the weapons are great, and the missions are great. The only thing that is NOT great is the GRAPHICS. They are pretty bad. Still, it's a good game. And not just any one can play it. You need to like the genre to like it. Rent it first, and see how it goes.

SUCKS SUCKS SUCKS DONT WASTE YOUR MONEY

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 2 / 18
Date: December 24, 2004
Author: Amazon User

THIS GAME WAS ABSOLUTELY HORRIBLE. THE GRAPHICS SUCKED!!! THERE WAS NO MULTIPLAYER OTHER THAN ONLINE. THERE WERE NO INGAME SAVE POINTS, NO MATTER HOW LONG THE LEVEL. THERE WAS A LACK OF GOOD WEAPONS AND VEHICLES. IF YOU LIKE GOOD WWII GAMES THEN GET MEDAL OF HONOR FOR PC. DONT WASTE YOUR MONEY ON THIS CRAP. I DID AND NOW I AM SELLING IT ON [...]. ABSOLUTELY HORRIBLE.

thank you

Worst game ever

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 0 / 1
Date: February 07, 2008
Author: Amazon User

Don't buy this game. Not even for your worst enemy. Annoying sound track, lame story line and game gliches too numerous to list. What were these people thinking? My copy will be going to the nearest landfill ASAP. I refuse to subject anyone else to this game by selling it.

Lost in translation...

2 Rating: 2, Useful: 9 / 22
Date: November 26, 2004
Author: Amazon User

Ironically, I had preordered the console version of Call of Duty long before I had played the PC version. Yet with the release date oh so far away, I decided to take advantage of the recent price drop of the Call of Duty PC game hoping that it would tide me over. However, after playing countless hours of the game on my PC, I'd have to say that Call of Duty: Finest Hour is a bit of a disappointment. I understand that a console has nowhere near the processing power of a PC, yet I couldn't help but feel underwhelmed by FH's graphics which were simple and bland at best. However, I was mostly disappointed in the lack of save points throughout a level. That meant after spending ten minutes or so blasting your way through a difficult level, you would have to start the campaign all over again from start to finish if your player is killed. I always appreciate a challenge, yet not when the odds are overwhelmingly stacked against me. The one aspect that the console version did translate well was the "war is hell" theme. The beginning level featuring you as a Russian soldier taking back Stalingrad from the "steeking Germans" was intense with gunfire raining all around you and enemy soldiers around every corner. The death animations are overly exaggerated which made in difficult to distinguish whether or not an enemy was either wounded or dead only to have them shoot you in the back. I played this game for only an hour before I filed it away with my other games. I imagine that I will someday go back, but in the meantime, I'm having too much fun with the PC version.

Another average WWII game...

2 Rating: 2, Useful: 5 / 8
Date: May 30, 2005
Author: Amazon User

Call of Duty: Finest Hour is simply just another WWII game. It has decent graphics (although faces look horrible and animations aren't great) and sound, with a good framerate, but gameplay is standard fare. Of course it has its "epic" moments (Stalingrad in this game), but even they are getting stale. Also, there is too long of a gap between checkpoints, causing a headache-inducing amount of backtracking everytime you die.

I'm a big fan of first-person shooters, and I loved the original Medal of Honor: Allied Asault. This game, however, is just another console FPS based on WW2. Rent it first, see if you like it. The actor who plays President Palmer on "24" does some narration, which is probably the best part of the game.

what a drag!

2 Rating: 2, Useful: 4 / 19
Date: December 05, 2004
Author: Amazon User

When Call Of Duty was released last year, it redefined how intense combat could get in a video game. Now, spark studios has released finest hour for the systems. Good right? not entirely. Something was lost in the switching process, oh I don't know, like the whole frickin intensity and action!!!! Now all I feel is my character running around shooting stuff he can barely see because of the fuzzy graphics. The only good thing about this game is that it has an intresting story line and historical backround. Otherwise, stay the heak away from this budget title.

pathetic attempt at redoing the pc version

2 Rating: 2, Useful: 2 / 23
Date: November 16, 2005
Author: Amazon User

I have played the pc version of call of duty and it was an amazing game the ps2 version crap. Horrible graphics and stale gameplay make this game look like a turd in the toiltet compared to its pc counterpart even if you never played the pc version you wouldn't liket his game. A complete waste of money do not bother with this game.

Just Way too unrealistic, Get C.O.D. for PC

2 Rating: 2, Useful: 1 / 8
Date: May 03, 2005
Author: Amazon User

This game was horrible. I mean theres FPS that are unrealistic but fun, but this game just wasn't as fun as the COD on the pc's. I mean who wants to see the guy die the same time 12 times in a row! The only part of this game I liked on COD was the online multiplayer. The number of people was great, the environments were decent and the killing was really fun. I gotta give props for the Multiplayer. Even when i started out and i wasn't used to it, i came out of the round with at least 10 or 11 kills. The Campaign is horrible but the Multi-player is pretty good

Which game shold i get a Call Of Duty game or Brothers In Arms.

3 Rating: 3, Useful: 17 / 33
Date: January 19, 2006
Author: Amazon User

It is puzz;ing me-I am not interested in Medal Of Honor as they are old and haven`t recieved a good review sinch MOH3:FrontLine.
I hear good comments on Brothers In Arms AND on Call Of Duty games-I love War games FPS or TPS-as well as Military strategies like Ghost Recon and SOCOM games.So which should i get COD or BIA.On "Is this review hepful" thing Please click NO for BIA and YES for COD.It would be ghreat help from U guys.Thanks 4 reading.
-------------
"A name means nothin` on a battlefield after a weak no one has a name:Solid Snake MGS1/Big Boss MGS3

Review Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next 

Actions