0
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z




Playstation : Magic the Gathering : Battlemage Reviews

Gas Gauge: 40
Gas Gauge 40
Below are user reviews of Magic the Gathering : Battlemage and on the right are links to professionally written reviews. The summary of review scores shows the distribution of scores given by the professional reviewers for Magic the Gathering : Battlemage. Column height indicates the number of reviews with a score within the range shown at the bottom of the column. Higher scores (columns further towards the right) are better.

Summary of Review Scores
0's10's20's30's40's50's60's70's80's90's


ReviewsScore
Game Spot
Game FAQs
IGN 40






User Reviews (1 - 10 of 10)

Show these reviews first:

Highest Rated
Lowest Rated
Newest
Oldest
Most Helpful
Least Helpful



Cards VS. PSX

5 Rating: 5, Useful: 0 / 3
Date: September 02, 2001
Author: Amazon User

This will probably be a very good game if it is anything like the verry stratiegic card game.

Cards VS. PSX

5 Rating: 5, Useful: 1 / 7
Date: September 02, 2001
Author: Amazon User

This will probably be a very good game if it is anything like the verry stratiegic card game.

This Game is as much fun as The plague

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 3 / 5
Date: August 15, 2004
Author: Amazon User

I am a very young Magic Fan and I really liked the thought of making a game of the cards... Boy was I wrong.They say on the product information that it features all the cards from the original game.Ye.The original game the one that came out before i was born!It also says that it features over 200 spells.Yes it does though you can only use about 20!Overall this game sucks,If you want to play the game for less,go out by two Magic booster packs give one to your opponent(who preferably dosen't know a thing about Magic)and tell your opponent to play,Do not tell him anything about Magic and let him play.After about three moves you've won and that is the game except you are your opponent!

Magic

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 5 / 9
Date: April 18, 2002
Author: Amazon User

While not even close to the ccg,MTG:battlemage is a very simple game for people tired of most other game types.So sipmle to play,in fact,Magic veterans should have difficulty figuring out how to play it,though that wouldn't be a problem for some bored gamer with some extra cash on hand.

This game sucked

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 5 / 8
Date: June 13, 2004
Author: Amazon User

I hated this game. I loved Warcraft, and I love chess. I even love Magic. This game didn't make hardly any since, and it was very difficult to learn how to play.

Worst game in the history of all games

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 9 / 13
Date: July 31, 2002
Author: Amazon User

Who ever thought it was a good idea to make Magic: The Gathering a real time game with a selection of 25 cards and bad graphics, and cumbersome battles system really didn't think.

This is the absolute worst game to ever touch my playstation.

This was horrifying.

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 7 / 7
Date: November 07, 2003
Author: Amazon User

Let's forget that I'm a card-flipping Magic player and just look at this as a video game for a minute.
Bad graphics: The icons on the screen weren't only small, they were clumsy. Seriously, I've seen better graphics on the old Atari 2600 and that wasn't the most impressive piece of equipment ever.
Blasted little help from the manual. Not much manual there, truth be told. Instruction booklets are there to instruct, yes? Well, apparently we were both wrong. At least, that seems to be how these folks felt about it. The booklet I got was 6 pages or so and about as helpful as a case of ebola.

Now, let's factor in the fact that I'm a card-chuckin' Magic player.
WHAT IN THE WORLD WERE THESE PEOPLE THINKING? For that matter, what was Wizards thinking when they licensed this? "Real time"? Magic is strategy and thought (yes, and luck), decision making and anticipation of your opponent. Kinda like chess with way more possible moves. Not exactly a heart-pounding thing, is it? And this isn't even "Shivan Hellkite vs. Lord of the Pit" stuff, either. It's a battle-strategy game... with little running green dots... that make your character twitch like a Karate Champ background character.
Disappointing, unimpressive and ineffectual. Bad game! Bad, bad game! No biscuit for you.

Excellent!

5 Rating: 5, Useful: 21 / 31
Date: December 05, 2001
Author: Amazon User

This game is more fun to the people that know how to play the actual card game BUT it is also fun for people who don't know about the game. It has lots of creatures and spells for all magic people. This game rocks!

What a pile of total and utter PANTS!

2 Rating: 2, Useful: 11 / 12
Date: January 10, 2004
Author: Amazon User

Okay firstly let me assure you that I am a MAGIC fan. I have zillions of cards (not joking here chaps!) love the online version and even have and also love the PC versions of MAGIC the Gathering, Duels of the Plainswalkers and Spells of the Ancients.

So as you can obviously see I am a real fan.

Of course I expected the Playstation game MAGIC to be as good as all of the above.

It wasn't!

In fact it is the biggest pile of PANTS I have come across in all my born days and let me tell you I have read, seen, watched, even participated in the little known experience of PANTSVILLE, but nothing comes anywhere as near to total PANTS than this game!

Okay so what is wrong with it?

The graphics are rubbish and unimaginative, I could do better and I failed Technical Drawing at School! The instruction manual stinks big time; it gives you next to no help with the complicated commands so you have to try and work out what you are doing blindly. Now in some Playstation games the above is quite easy. Not in this game let me assure you, you have more chance of negotiating a mind field blindfold on a pogo stick than getting this game to work without some sort of written instructions.

Even if you manage to work out how to play the game, you quickly find yourself bored with the one dimensional imagery and the awful creatures, spells and enchantments that are nothing like the PC version. I'm aware that on Playstation game I can't expect PC quality, but you can expect a whole lot better than what this game offers.

All in all a bitter disappointment, no wonder it sank like the Titanic, in fact, I'm surprised it even got launched in the first place.

The only reason it gets two stars is that I am such a MAGIC fan I can't bring myself to give it one star, call me sentimental but I just can't.

If you have any sense, don't even BORROW this game from a friend, instead of other more fun ways to play the game.

As another critic said in his review, this is about as much fun "as a case of Ebola", Amen to that sentiment my friend!

Bleak and uninteresting compared with the original

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 45 / 46
Date: November 20, 1999
Author: Amazon User

This is basically an attempt to put a game which relies on unpredictability and near-infinite variety into a more predictable format.

First of all, let me say that the original card game is a thousand times better than this version of it. The feel is simply.... different, and the game's unique spirit is very much lost due to that very fact. The game was plagued by problems as it was on PC, and the Playstation version is even worse. It is hard to see what exactly you've summoned, such is the horrendously small size of the onscreen objects. The absence of a mouse and a small number of usable buttons turn the game into a session of maddening joystick-toggling and button-mashing. But these are just the faults of the engine. Here's what's wrong with the game's idea: the game is not turn-based, like it should be, but real time, so all the fun of timed strategy is lost in favor of getting as many things out as fast as you can. It is hard to imagine a game which contains such a statement as "all cards untap at the beginning of the turn" turned to real time. What you get is basically a Warcraft clone, and not a wonderful one at that.

If you're a fan of frantic pseudo-strategy, buy this game. Otherwise go elsewhere.


Review Page: 1 



Actions