0
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z




PC - Windows : Chessmaster 7000 Reviews

Gas Gauge: 81
Gas Gauge 81
Below are user reviews of Chessmaster 7000 and on the right are links to professionally written reviews. The summary of review scores shows the distribution of scores given by the professional reviewers for Chessmaster 7000. Column height indicates the number of reviews with a score within the range shown at the bottom of the column. Higher scores (columns further towards the right) are better.

Summary of Review Scores
0's10's20's30's40's50's60's70's80's90's


ReviewsScore
Game Spot 81
CVG 82






User Reviews (1 - 11 of 21)

Show these reviews first:

Highest Rated
Lowest Rated
Newest
Oldest
Most Helpful
Least Helpful



Very Unsatisfied

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 2 / 7
Date: April 06, 2005
Author: Amazon User

I have never experienced so many defects in a computer program. Absolutely WORTHLESS!!! And no, I do not have a bootleg copy. This product is a joke.

Excellent application that could use some improvement

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 12 / 12
Date: October 21, 2002
Author: Amazon User

I've owned and used all the Chessmaster programs beginning with Chessmaster 2100 including Chessmaster 3000 for the Mac. The program has gradually become stronger and stronger, from perhaps something like a clueless class D player to something like a grandmaster. The engine in this program on today's fast machines can play five-minute chess as well as all but the top grandmasters, and at whatever time limit as well as an international master. However the ratings given for the various personalities need to be taken with a grain of salt and some understanding. I'll get to that in a bit.

First there are still in the program some annoying bugs and some plainly bad programming practices. Most annoying to me is the fact that the games are not automatically saved; worse yet, you are not even asked if you want to save the current game. This is contrary to standard practice in virtually all applications that I am familiar with, and I wish that Chessmaster would do something about it. Next, when you do save a game under a name you choose, should you need to save it again after some further moves, you are given as the default not the name you chose and are using, but the regular CM default (players and date). If you play two games on the same date with the same players and same colors, CM will suggest the name of the first game when you try to save the second game. If you don't intervene, you will overwrite the first game. Not good!

The database is not as well constructed as it might be. You can only view the games directly in the database mode from the White side on a small board. Also there is a bug that sometimes skips a move when you hit the "forward a move" button. Nonetheless, a database of almost half a million games (with some repetitions) is an invaluable resource. By the way, I have played over many of the games and so far have found only a couple of obvious errors. There are others I'm missing of course. Some of the Fischer games that were adjourned I noticed are scored as not completed when in fact one of the players (usually not Fischer!) resigned without resuming play.

The rated games format allows one to adjourn a game and then later delete that game and thereby "cheat." If you are clearly lost in a rated game, you can adjourn it and then never call the game up again and avoid the rating point loss. You can even delete the file. (Just a tip to those who like to cheat at solitaire, and a warning to take anyone's rating against Chessmaster with a grain of salt.) The rated game feature might be better if no adjourned games were allowed, or if allowed, require that they be finished by some date (as in the old real world of chess) or rated as lost.

A nice improvement from earlier editions is that the Think Lines window shows the moves in figurine notation and they are numbered so it is much easier to read them. A further readability improvement would be to put commas in the number of positions that Chessmaster has considered.

The personalities (one of CM7000's best features) are still a work in progress. The ratings are derived from play against the machine and not against human players, which is why they are a little weird. Still, just because the personality makes weak moves on occasion, moves so bad logically and positionally that even a "C" player would never make them, doesn't mean that the personality isn't stronger than a "C" player or even an "A" player. This is because even though it makes silly moves it more than compensates by seldom making any tactically blunders. In fact, the "strangeness" of the personalities stems from the fact that CM has not really worked out how to weaken the personalities in a humanoid way. Most human players tend to overlook a two-move tactical point from time to time. (Less than expert players probably do it on average at least once a game.) And few human players below the master level go through a game without making a tactical error somewhere along the way that loses at least the equivalent of a pawn. What the CM program needs to do is program their personalities to make human-like tactical errors and fewer positional monstrosities.

I also think that CM ought to allow a personality or even itself to resign when it is clearly beaten. Chess programs typically do not resign, of course, no matter how bleak the outlook. Why? I'm not sure, but I think one reason is that it's impossible for the program to know when the situation really is hopeless. Since humans are always prone to error (even grandmasters have allowed mates in winning positions) and since the program never gets tired, why resign? But "resigns" is a gentlemanly way to end a game. Note that in games against grandmasters, the programmers resign for the program when it is hopeless.

One way to incorporate "resigns" into the CM's vocabulary would be to allow the user to set a criterium of futility, say two and a half pawns. (Complexity of position could also be considered.) Or CM could take into account the rating or previous play of the player and make an assessment.

Despite these suggestions for improvement, the bottom line as far as I am concerned is that CM7000 is a great application, a source of entertainment, competition and instruction that chess players just a few years ago could only dream about.

Good program, lousy compatibility

2 Rating: 2, Useful: 7 / 7
Date: August 16, 2002
Author: Amazon User

The program itself is quite good for an intermediate player like myself. However, it does not run on my Win2K machine at all. I loaded it on my Windows XP machine, but this isn't much better. The game runs, but has a habit of locking up the PC unexpectedly and randomly in the middle of games. I plan to ask for my money back.

Beginners Only

3 Rating: 3, Useful: 6 / 13
Date: August 20, 2001
Author: Amazon User

It is annoying that the hype says this is the "number one" chess computer game. It clearly is not, and the serious player should consider games such as those produced by Rebel (....) I find there is something amaturish about this game, and why does it STILL not run on windows 2000?

Not compatible with Windows 2000

3 Rating: 3, Useful: 21 / 26
Date: November 29, 2000
Author: Amazon User

Yes, CM7000 is pretty great. But, it works only poorly under Win2K. Lots of other programs that work on 98 and NT work just fine under Win2K, but not Chessmaster 7000. It pisses me off, because Chessmaster 8000 isn't supported on Windows 2000 either -- although the website says that it should work, it's just not supported. Also, beware the 1.0.6 update, available on the website; it took my installation of CM7000 from working poorly to not working at all. On the other hand, the games analyzed and *narrated* by Josh Waitzkin are fantastic.

Makes learning fun

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 5 / 5
Date: November 24, 2000
Author: Amazon User

I had not tried ChessMaster since about version 3000. I was able to get a version from an online auction for 10 dollars. It was really worth it. I really enjoy the games by Josh, and the way he describes what is going on in his own words. This is more enjoyable than reading a chess book or magazine for example and moving the pieces on your own. Many of the tutorials are really good too. The only drawback might be that some of the learning things are not as interactive as they could be, which might make the learning faster.

There definetly are some technical glitches ranging from positions that have incorrect answers, to what looks like a serious memory leak. You must go to their website and get the patches. I sent them several e-mails, but got no response, which was annoying.

But I would recommend the program to beginners and tournament players a like. There is something in there for everyone.

A real Master of a Program!

5 Rating: 5, Useful: 12 / 14
Date: November 19, 2000
Author: Amazon User

It seems kind of dumb to review this program, now that CM 8000 is out. But here goes:

This is a great program. I have spent many hours with this puppy. I am a USCF Master, and I have beaten this program (on its top level) only a handful of times. Of course the strength of the program will be based on the speed of your computer's processor chip. I.e., the faster the processor, the stronger the program.

Some of the features I liked: A library of around 300,000 games!! A multiple personality, programmable playing engine. (There is almost an infinite variety of playing strengths here.) Josh Waitzkin's voice as he goes over some of his best games! (He explains the variations in great detail.) Josh will become your personal chess coach. You will definitely learn from watching his games and analysis.{See his victory over my friend, Moshe Khatena from a tournament in Bermuda.} I could go on and on. But by now, you should get the general idea.

I can heartily recommend CM 7000 to ANYONE. If you don't like it, I will buy it back from you. [I won't promise to pay full retail, however. ;) ]

Fantastic Chess Software Product.........but

4 Rating: 4, Useful: 12 / 13
Date: November 11, 2000
Author: Amazon User

If you are a keen Chess player who wants a program that is highly interesting to play and study with - BUY THIS PRODUCT. The strength of the engine is absolutely superb. With a sacrificial, attacking style, it will play probably at 2500 level on a fast Pentium or Athlon - probably marginally behind the very strongest engines available. At blitz chess it plays at Grandmaster level. The graphics are superb and the range of features is excellent. In particular, the "Natural Language Advice" feature is unique and one of the best instruction facilities I have seen in chess software. Here, however, is my proviso. If you already have Chessmaster 6000, it is not worth upgrading as the engine is the same. Also, I still find it annoying that it cannot analyse a game Chessbase style. Let's hope this is in 8000!

Very good for a first-time chessmaster user, but...

3 Rating: 3, Useful: 5 / 6
Date: November 08, 2000
Author: Amazon User

I've been using Chessmaster6000 since 1998 and I always liked it a lot. The program not only looks very nice (which can't be said of all major chess programs) but also is very "playable", whether you want to just play chess, improve your game, analyse, study theory or whatever. This being said I have to admit that I'm not really impressed with Chessmaster7000. The division in "rooms" is very nice (if you want to analyse you go to one room, if you want to work with databases you go to another and so on) and works very well. With these rooms you easily get where you want. If you have children in the "chess learning age": there's a childrens room where kids can learn and/to play in a way that looks good to me. But again, apart from these rooms Chessmaster7000 doesn't add much to the functionality of Chessmaster6000. So I'd say : try to define what you expect from Chessmaster7000 and then decide if you want to buy.

PS: if you use Chessmaster6000 to play via MPlayer.com, you have no choice but to buy 7000 (almost anybody else does and aparently you can't use 6000 to play against someone who's using 7000.....:-(

Save Your Money For Chessmaster 8000; Chess Neophytes....

1 Rating: 1, Useful: 2 / 3
Date: October 20, 2000
Author: Amazon User

This software is excellant for chess neophytes on the contrary don't acquire this item if you have a previous version, i.e. Chessmaster 4000.

For a game that's released in 1999 with that price tag, I expect the graphics to be superb. There are a few number of the same chess set styles from the Chessmaster 4000 game! Sure, it has the QuickTime 4.0 video and the Chessmaster Live, but solely judging this software on the basis of overall quality, please save your money for the Chessmaster 8000.

For a neophyte whom doesn't have prior chess softwares other than the prevous Chessmaster series, get this title. For you guys, it has the interactive teaching and a "Kid's Room" with a commencing introduction by the international chapion Josh [can't recall surname].


Review Page: 1 2 3 Next 



Actions