Below are user reviews of King's Field II and on the right are links to professionally written reviews.
The summary of review scores shows the distribution of scores given by the professional reviewers for King's Field II.
Column height indicates the number of reviews with a score within the range shown at the bottom of the column.
Higher scores (columns further towards the right) are better.
Summary of Review Scores |
| | | | | | | | | |
0's | 10's | 20's | 30's | 40's | 50's | 60's | 70's | 80's | 90's |
User Reviews (1 - 11 of 11)
Show these reviews first:
Strange, dreamlike, "rpg" quake-like game.
4
Rating: 4,
Useful: 5 / 5
Date: November 20, 1999
Author: Amazon User
In this sequel, Ascii Entertainment added a journal feature that allows you to look back over everything that anyone has said to your character before during the game. Just as in the original, the pace is slow and dreamlike. The real-time first-person perspective makes the game feel like some sort of twisted nightmare, and the slow pace allows you to get a good look at all of the strange 3d-rendered enemies as they kill you. All of the enemies are rendered 3d objects, which adds to the twisted realism. I have never seen any game similar to this one except for Kings Field [i]; you should probably try it out before you decide to buy it. I haven't found any Save Crystals yet, so I don't know how many blocks a save uses. The game loads the surronding terrain continuously after it starts up (which takes about 10-15s, if I remember rightly), so you will not have to wait around after you begin playing. The rendering in this game is really beautiful; so far I can't remember having seen any polygon tear while playing it. The slow pace and bizzare plotline will probably make this game unsuitable for some younger players; it is near Resident Evil on the Absolute Terror/Shock gauge. Really twisted game; every PS-X owner searching for the strange and unusual should try it at least once. If you like this game, be sure to get Kings Field I as well.
this game is the worst
4
Rating: 4,
Useful: 2 / 7
Date: November 20, 1999
Author: Amazon User
the graphics to this game are bad and the storyline is not to well either.i wouldn'6t reccomend to buy this gam
An excellent example of Action RPG done right!
4
Rating: 4,
Useful: 3 / 3
Date: November 30, 1999
Author: Amazon User
The graphics of this game were well-done, and the music and sound lent a very dark, foreboding atmosphere to the game, which fits perfectly with the storyline. Getting the hang of the battle system for first-timers may take a bit of work, but you quickly learn the value of the strafing buttons.
The dungeons are incrediably complex. You will find yourself revisiting them over and over again to use the items or new abilities you gathered to open up that other section or so. Add to that the complexity of the traps and the dozens of hidden rooms and monsters, and you could easily spend hours in each dungeon.
The storyline and character development are excellent, and you will quickly find yourself absorbed into the game, just wanting to get that one last area... And then find out that there's multiple endings.
Easily worth the money. Get it.
Entertaining!
4
Rating: 4,
Useful: 2 / 2
Date: February 20, 2000
Author: Amazon User
I enjoy this game as much as any RPG I have played. Haven't finished it yet, but it is more entertaining than the Final Fantasy Series of VII and VIII, toward the end they get very repetitive and time consuming to defeat the big guys. This one so far seems more practical in it's progression to the top levels. At top levels you will be able to defeat the bad guys in a reasonable amount of time, more with skill than with luck. Learn the movement techniques and the right weapons and you will be successful. Final Fantasy VIII results seem more dependent on luck of the draw. Sometimes your best spells are used, sometimes not. King's Field I seem to be able to control the outcome more. King's Field I can play without purchasing a Stragedy Guide, Final Fantasy is impossible without one. So give it a try, there are many interesting things you will have to figure out and some really determined monsters to cope with. Graphics are terrific, nice looking, you move fast from cave to dungeon to mazes. I love creeeping around those narrow walkways over the lava river underneath! One really nice ability is to recall conversations you have had with anyone you ever talked to, that has been a real help, you don't have to write anything down and can review them anytime you wish. Improvements? - 1. I would like the ability to save more convenient, and, 2. when I have been killed I would also like the game to start over at the last crystal screen where I saved it. 3. The map of Verdite is virtually unusable/unreadable, useless!
This game does not deserve a star.
4
Rating: 4,
Useful: 1 / 5
Date: March 27, 2000
Author: Amazon User
This game is so unbelievablely horrible. Here's how I would rate it in the following classes
RPG = F Storyline = F Graphics = D Senseless killing game thats real awful = A++++++++
Trust me this game is really really really really (don't want to exceed the limit.) Awful! Don't waste your money.
I bought this game expecting the best
4
Rating: 4,
Useful: 1 / 5
Date: April 02, 2000
Author: Amazon User
I got it and realized it was the worst game I have ever played. As far as I could see there was really no storyline. The viewpoint in this game is awful, you see through the eyes of the person, much like Doom. There's no world map or anything. I played for like 5 hours and got nowhere. There's no battle screen, you just slash things a couple times and they die (this is all done on the main screen. The graphics are comparable to Wolfenstein 3-d (they're garbage) And the music is bad too. This game is only an RPG to those who consider horrible shooting games RPG's, for the serious gamer, this game is a joke. Oh yeah and the voice over at the beginning is real bad
Master of a Masterpiece
5
Rating: 5,
Useful: 2 / 2
Date: July 31, 2002
Author: Amazon User
King's Field (the original) received my full recomendation. King's Field II surpasses it. This game is everything the first was, and more. The world is larger and more detailed, the enemies are uniquely designed with an array of new faces along side King's Field I returnees. There is more user friendly command configuration, and a memory list of all the NPC's who have talked to you (no need for a sharp memory, like in the first). If you were even remotely interested in the first game, this game is more then double the value. If you are new to the King's Field world, this game will not spoil the first. Both are worth your time and money.
Entertaining... if you have NO life.
1
Rating: 1,
Useful: 0 / 5
Date: July 06, 2003
Author: Amazon User
This is one of the most horrible games I've ever had the sad experience to play. This is worse than "Lords of Magic" on the PC, and if you've ever played that game, you'll be cringing now. It's boring, the interface is awkward. The graphics are absymal. The combat method is unbearably tedious. Do not waste your money.
Very addicting.
4
Rating: 4,
Useful: 4 / 4
Date: November 15, 2003
Author: Amazon User
I've read many reviews on this game, and they're all divided. But, here's my review. The graphics are very good. Detailed enough to see what's what. The music is cool because it changes depending on the area that you are in, which serves as a guide to help you remember where you're at. Items like the Pixy Map, and others really, really help. The pace of the game is extremely slow, but what keeps you involved is the fact that you can raise your HP and MP levels to make you stronger, faster, and a more powerful Spell caster. I really like the enemies. There are a good variation of them. Bloodworm, Skeletons, Blobs, Spider-Women, Golums, Mummies, etc. I like the fact that you really have to raise your experience levels before attempting to go to new areas. Because, you'll know once you get there if you're not quite ready for those creatures. I like to open the chests and get items. That's fun because most of the items really aid you on your quest. While others, like coins, sometimes don't bring as much satisfaction as, let's say, a sword, shield, or Fire Crystal. This game is not a very action oriented game. It teeters on action and strategy. You need to learn which weapons work best for certain creatures. The only thing I didn't like about the game is the characters you talk to move too, too slow and they have no facial features whatsoever. Also, you need to read what they're saying. I'm sure they could've used real voice actors. That would definitely make it more interesting.
As my title says, "Addicting". I finished the game. But, I was so bent on finishing the game that one time my memory card failed me and I lost my game. I actually started over from the beginning and was careful to save two copies of the game, that way I always had a back up!! I'm in the information systems business, so I know about the importance about backups. Never thought I'd need it for a video game console. Shows that you can learn new things all the time, at a high cost unfortunately. Well, that's it. I recommend this game for those that don't mind featureless characters, and slow pace. But, traveling to different lands and besting the denizons that inhabit these lands is worth it all. Plus, by now, the game is pretty easy to find at a cheaper price these days.
stepping backwards
1
Rating: 1,
Useful: 1 / 3
Date: August 06, 2004
Author: Amazon User
while Kings field held me enthralled, while I adapted to the combat system and overlooked some small flaws. the second outing completely dissapointed me. while the gameplay remained much the same, I found no reason to continue further in this one.
Any storyline or motivation seems to have gone out the window. anyone who has played the first, understood the characters position and stumbled onto that giant squid! will know what I mean and anyone who has not already done so should seek out the first instead which is an absolute classic.
Review Page:
1 2 Next
Actions